Chronic respiratory failure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease under home noninvasive ventilation: Real-life study

Background: Home noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been increasingly used in stable chronic pulmonary disease obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF). (COPD); However its effectiveness remains debatable. Aim: To describe a follow-up of COPD patients under home NIV. respiratory failure Methods: Retrospective descriptive study based on a prospective 3-year database that included (CHRF); COPD patients under home NIV between August 2011 and July 2014. Results: Within the 334 patients initially screened, 109 (32.6%) had COPD with a mean +/- SD Noninvasive post-bronchodilator FEV1 of 38.6 +/- 14.9% predicted; age of 65.6 +/- 9.6 years. The mean +/- SD duration of ventilation was 63.4 +/- 51.1 months. Heterogeneous comorbidities Hospitalization that can contribute to CHRF were not excluded: obstructive sleep apnea and obesity were the most prevalent. Sixty-two (56.9%) patients started NIV during admission with acute respiratory failure. During follow-up there was a significant increase in mean inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) and respiratory rate (19.5 +/- 4.4 vs. 23.6 +/- 5.3 cmH(2)O and 10.7 +/- 5.2 vs. 15.2 +/- 1.4 breaths/min, respectively, p < 0.0001), with a significant improvement in hypercapnia (PaCO2: 52.9 +/- 7.7 vs. 49.5 +/- 7.5 mmHg, p < 0.0001), with 93.3% of patients compliant to NIV. Admissions and days spent in hospital for respiratory illness significantly decreased after institution of NIV (respectively, 1.2 +/- 1.1 vs. 0.7 +/- 1.8 and 15.0 +/- 16.8 vs. 8.8 +/- 19.4, p < 0.001). At final evaluation, patients with severe hypercapnia (n = 47; PaCO2 >50 mmHg) performing NIV at higher pressures (n=30; PAP >= 25 cmH(2)O) were more compliant (10.1 +/- 3.3 vs. 6.1 +/- 3.6 h/day). Three-year mortality was 24.8% (27 of 109 patients). Conclusions: This is a real-life retrospective study in COPD patients with CHRF which results suggest benefit from home NIV. For most, NIV was effective and tolerable even at high pressures. (C) 2018 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.