I See/Hear What You Mean: Semantic Activation in Visual Word Recognition Depends on Perceptual Attention

被引:55
作者
Connell, Louise [1 ,2 ]
Lynott, Dermot [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Dept Psychol, Lancaster LA1 4YF, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Psychol Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Decis & Cognit Sci Res Ctr, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
visual word recognition; semantics; perceptual strength; perceptual attention; MODALITY EXCLUSIVITY NORMS; ACQUISITION RATINGS; READING ALOUD; AGE; IMAGEABILITY; SIMULATION; EXPERIENCE; FREQUENCY; PROPERTY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1037/a0034626
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
How does the meaning of a word affect how quickly we can recognize it? Accounts of visual word recognition allow semantic information to facilitate performance but have neglected the role of modality-specific perceptual attention in activating meaning. We predicted that modality-specific semantic information would differentially facilitate lexical decision and reading aloud, depending on how perceptual attention is implicitly directed by each task. Large-scale regression analyses showed the perceptual modalities involved in representing a word's referent concept influence how easily that word is recognized. Both lexical decision and reading-aloud tasks direct attention toward vision, and are faster and more accurate for strongly visual words. Reading aloud additionally directs attention toward audition and is faster and more accurate for strongly auditory words. Furthermore, the overall semantic effects are as large for reading aloud as lexical decision and are separable from age-of-acquisition effects. These findings suggest that implicitly directing perceptual attention toward a particular modality facilitates representing modality-specific perceptual information in the meaning of a word, which in turn contributes to the lexical decision or reading-aloud response.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 533
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Visual word recognition of single-syllable words [J].
Balota, DA ;
Cortese, MJ ;
Sergent-Marshall, SD ;
Spieler, DH ;
Yap, MJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2004, 133 (02) :283-316
[2]   The English Lexicon Project [J].
Balota, David A. ;
Yap, Melvin J. ;
Cortese, Michael J. ;
Hutchison, Keith A. ;
Kessler, Brett ;
Loftis, Bjorn ;
Neely, James H. ;
Nelson, Douglas L. ;
Simpson, Greg B. ;
Treiman, Rebecca .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (03) :445-459
[3]  
Balota DA, 2012, CUR ISS PSYCHOL LANG, P90
[4]  
Barsalou LW, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P577, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
[5]   1ST IN, 1ST OUT - WORD LEARNING AGE AND SPOKEN WORD-FREQUENCY AS PREDICTORS OF WORD FAMILIARITY AND WORD NAMING LATENCY [J].
BROWN, GDA ;
WATSON, FL .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1987, 15 (03) :208-216
[6]   DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud [J].
Coltheart, M ;
Rastle, K ;
Perry, C ;
Langdon, R ;
Ziegler, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (01) :204-256
[7]  
Connell L., TOPICS COGN IN PRESS
[8]  
Connell L., 2012, FRONT PSYCHOL, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.3389/FPSYG.2012.00474
[9]   Flexible and fast: Linguistic shortcut affects both shallow and deep conceptual processing [J].
Connell, Louise ;
Lynott, Dermot .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2013, 20 (03) :542-550
[10]   Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability [J].
Connell, Louise ;
Lynott, Dermot .
COGNITION, 2012, 125 (03) :452-465