Why different trust relationships matter for information systems users

被引:125
作者
Soellner, Matthias [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmann, Axel [2 ]
Leimeister, Jan Marco [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Gallen, Inst Informat Management, Unterer Graben 21, CH-9000 St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] Univ Kassel, Informat Syst, D-34121 Kassel, Germany
关键词
trust; multiple targets of trust; free simulation experiment; network of trust; trust in the information system; trust in the provider; INITIAL CONSUMER TRUST; E-COMMERCE; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; ONLINE MARKETPLACES; ELECTRONIC MARKETS; RESEARCH AGENDA; PRICE PREMIUMS; WORK OUTCOMES; WEB SITE; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1057/ejis.2015.17
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Technology acceptance research has shown that trust is an important factor fostering use of information systems (IS). As a result, numerous IS researchers have studied factors that build trust in IS. However, IS research on trust has mainly focused on the trust relationship between the user and the IS itself, largely neglecting that other targets of trust might also drive IS use from a user's point of view. Accordingly, we investigate the importance of different targets of trust in IS use. Therefore, we use the concept of a network of trust and identify four different targets of trust that are prevalent from a user's point of view. Afterwards, we develop our research model and evaluate it using a free simulation experiment. The results show that multiple targets of trust are important in the context of IS use. In particular, we highlight the importance of a second target trust in the provider which is equally important as trust in the IS itself. Consequently, IS providers should focus not only on fostering users' trust in their IS but also on positioning themselves as trustworthy providers. In addition, we show that a third target trust in the Internet has significant indirect effects on multiple constructs that impact IS use.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 287
页数:14
相关论文
共 82 条
[51]   Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology [J].
McKnight, DH ;
Choudhury, V ;
Kacmar, C .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (03) :334-359
[52]  
Mcknight D. H., 2011, ACM TRANS MANAG INF, V2, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1985347.1985353, https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985353]
[53]   Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships [J].
Mcknight, DH ;
Cummings, LL ;
Chervany, NL .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (03) :473-490
[54]  
McKnight DH, 2002, J STRATEGIC INF SYST, V11, P297, DOI 10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00020-3
[55]   TRUST IN AUTOMATION .1. THEORETICAL ISSUES IN THE STUDY OF TRUST AND HUMAN INTERVENTION IN AUTOMATED SYSTEMS [J].
MUIR, BM .
ERGONOMICS, 1994, 37 (11) :1905-1922
[56]  
NIELSEN, 2009, CONS CONF SURV
[57]   Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust [J].
Pavlou, PA ;
Gefen, D .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (01) :37-59
[58]   The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation [J].
Pavlou, Paul A. ;
Dimoka, Angelika .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (04) :392-414
[59]  
Petter S, 2007, MIS QUART, V31, P623
[60]   Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies [J].
Podsakoff, PM ;
MacKenzie, SB ;
Lee, JY ;
Podsakoff, NP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (05) :879-903