Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chinese Short-Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) in women with breast cancer

被引:10
作者
Zhou, Kaina [1 ]
Li, Minjie [1 ]
Wang, Wen [1 ]
An, Jinghua [1 ]
Huo, Lanting [1 ]
He, Xiaole [1 ]
Li, Jin [1 ]
Zhuang, Guihua [2 ]
Li, Xiaomei [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Nursing, Hlth Sci Ctr, 76 Yanta West Rd, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Sci Ctr, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
breast cancer; China; health-related quality of life; reliability; sensitivity; validity; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FACT-B; VALIDATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURVIVORS; PREDICTORS; SYMPTOM; SCALE; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1111/jep.13088
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale, aims, and objectives The psychometrics of the Short-Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) in female breast cancer patients remains unknown. This study aimed to test the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chinese SF-36v2 in women with breast cancer. Methods The sample included 326 eligible participants. The reliability and the item convergent and discriminant validity were estimated using Cronbach alpha (>= 0.70) and the multi-trait multi-item matrix analysis, respectively. The structural validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Sensitivity was determined via an analysis of variance and the relative efficiency for initially diagnosed cases (yes vs no) as well as the time since diagnosis (years) before and after stratifying by initially diagnosed cases. Results The overall Cronbach alpha was 0.91 (eight scales range: 0.72-0.92). All hypothesized item-scale correlations were greater than the alternatives (r >= 0.40). With acceptable model fit indices, the physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health subscales had stronger contributions to the physical component summary (goodness-of-fit index [GFI]: 0.92, parsimony goodness-of-fit index [PGFI]: 0.60, comparative fit index [CFI]: 0.91, Tucker-Lewis index [TLI]: 0.93, adjusted goodness-of-fit index [AGFI]: 0.91, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA]: 0.06, normed chi-squared [NC]: 2.65), while the vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health subscales contributed more to the mental component summary (GFI: 0.91, PGFI: 0.62, CFI: 0.91, TLI: 0.92, AGFI: 0.91, RMSEA: 0.07, NC: 2.76). The relative efficiencies with significant F-statistics were found for mental health (relative efficiency: 34.28; initially diagnosed cases), physical functioning (12.88; time since diagnosis), and physical functioning (5.80), role-physical (5.15), bodily pain (7.70), social functioning (4.62), role-emotional (4.72), mental health (4.75), and physical component summary (6.96; initially diagnosed cases with time since diagnosis; P < 0.05 for all variables). Conclusions Chinese SF-36v2 has acceptable psychometric properties and is suitable for women with breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:864 / 872
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Reliability and validity of the English (Singapore) and Chinese (Singapore) versions of the Short-Form 36 version 2 in a multi-ethnic Urban Asian population in Singapore [J].
Thumboo, Julian ;
Wu, Yi ;
Tai, E-Shyong ;
Gandek, Barbara ;
Lee, Jeannette ;
Ma, Stefan ;
Heng, Derrick ;
Wee, Hwee-Lin .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (09) :2501-2508
[42]   Reliability and validity of the English (Singapore) and Chinese (Singapore) versions of the Short-Form 36 version 2 in a multi-ethnic Urban Asian population in Singapore [J].
Julian Thumboo ;
Yi Wu ;
E-Shyong Tai ;
Barbara Gandek ;
Jeannette Lee ;
Stefan Ma ;
Derrick Heng ;
Hwee-Lin Wee .
Quality of Life Research, 2013, 22 :2501-2508
[43]   Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Short-form Supportive Care Needs Survey Questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-J) [J].
Okuyama, Toru ;
Akechi, Tatsuo ;
Yamashita, Hiroko ;
Toyama, Tatsuya ;
Endo, Chiharu ;
Sagawa, Ryuichi ;
Uchida, Megumi ;
Furukawa, Toshiaki A. .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 18 (09) :1003-1010
[44]   Reliability and Validity of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) in Adults with Non-Cancer Pain [J].
Hayes, Corey J. ;
Bhandari, Naleen Raj ;
Kathe, Niranjan ;
Payakachat, Nalin .
HEALTHCARE, 2017, 5 (02)
[45]   Validating an Amharic version of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in individuals with leprosy in Ethiopia [J].
Lambert, Saba Maria ;
Nigusse, Shimelis ;
Alembo, Digafe ;
Walker, Stephen ;
Nicholls, Peter ;
Lockwood, Diana Nancy .
LEPROSY REVIEW, 2023, 94 (01) :53-69
[46]   A comparison of quality of life in adolescents with epilepsy or asthma using the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) [J].
Wang, Ji ;
Wang, Yi ;
Wang, Li Bo ;
Xu, Hui ;
Zhang, Xiao-lei .
EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2012, 101 (1-2) :157-165
[47]   RELIABILITY OF THE HAND20 QUESTIONNAIRE: COMPARISON WITH THE 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY [J].
Moritomo, Hisao ;
Imaeda, Toshihiko ;
Gotani, Hiroyuki ;
Momose, Toshimitsu ;
Abe, Yukio ;
Oi, Hiroyuki ;
Omokawa, Shohei ;
Sawaizumi, Takuya ;
Nemoto, Koichi .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-ASIAN-PACIFIC VOLUME, 2014, 19 (01) :1-6
[48]   Psychometric Properties of the Korean Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 for Assessing the General Population [J].
Kim, Seon Ha ;
Jo, Min-Woo ;
Lee, Sang-il .
ASIAN NURSING RESEARCH, 2013, 7 (02) :61-66
[49]   Reliability and validity of Short Form 36 Version 2 to measure health perceptions in a sub-group of individuals with fatigue [J].
Davenport, Todd E. ;
Stevens, Staci R. ;
Baroni, Katie ;
Van Ness, J. Mark ;
Snell, Christopher R. .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 33 (25-26) :2596-2604
[50]   The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version [J].
Montazeri, A ;
Goshtasebi, A ;
Vahdaninia, M ;
Gandek, B .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (03) :875-882