Ten Important Considerations for Ovarian Cancer Screening

被引:6
作者
Pavlik, Edward J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chandler Med Ctr, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Markey Canc Ctr, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
来源
DIAGNOSTICS | 2017年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
ovarian; cancer; screening; considerations; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; UK COLLABORATIVE TRIAL; STATISTICAL EVIDENCE; REVISED STANDARDS; LYNCH SYNDROME; DOUBLING TIME; SURVIVAL; CARE; IMPACT; BRCA2;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics7020022
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The unique intricacies of ovarian cancer screening and perspectives of different screening methods are presented as ten considerations that are examined. Included in these considerations are: (1) Deciding on the number of individuals to be screened; (2) Anticipating screening group reductions due to death; (3) Deciding on the duration and frequency of screening; (4) Deciding on an appropriate follow-up period after screening; (5) Deciding on time to surgery when malignancy is suspected; (6) Deciding on how screen-detected ovarian cancers are treated and by whom; (7) Deciding on how to treat the data of enrolled participants; (8) Deciding on the most appropriate way to assign disease-specific death; (9) Deciding how to avoid biases caused by enrollments that attract participants with late-stage disease who are either symptomatic or disposed by factors that are genetic, environmental or social; and (10) Deciding whether the screening tool or a screening process is being tested. These considerations are presented in depth along with illustrations of how they impact the outcomes of ovarian cancer screening. The considerations presented provide alternative explanations of effects that have an important bearing on interpreting ovarian screening outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Screening for Ovarian Cancer: A Reality Check
    Ricci, Stephanie
    Shih, Ie-Ming
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 2 (02): : 73 - 75
  • [32] Screening for ovarian cancer in the general population
    Chu, CS
    Rubin, SC
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 20 (02) : 307 - 320
  • [33] Ultrasound and Ovarian Cancer Screening: Is There a Future?
    Rao, Archana
    Carter, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 18 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [34] Screening for Ovarian Cancer: A Reality Check
    Stephanie Ricci
    Ie-Ming Shih
    Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2013, 2 (2) : 73 - 75
  • [35] Psychological Sequelae of Ovarian Cancer Screening and Genetic Testing for Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility
    Howard, A. Fuchsia
    Pirotta, Marie
    Balneaves, Lynda G.
    CURRENT WOMENS HEALTH REVIEWS, 2011, 7 (04) : 358 - 366
  • [36] Ultrasound Monitoring of Extant Adnexal Masses in the Era of Type 1 and Type 2 Ovarian Cancers: Lessons Learned From Ovarian Cancer Screening Trials
    Ormsby, Eleanor L.
    Pavlik, Edward J.
    McGahan, John P.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2017, 7 (02)
  • [37] Screening for distress in patients with cancer: methodologic considerations
    Feldstain, A.
    Tomei, C.
    Belanger, M.
    Lebel, S.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (02) : E330 - E333
  • [38] Current and Emerging Methods for Ovarian Cancer Screening and Diagnostics: A Comprehensive Review
    Liberto, Juliane M.
    Chen, Sheng-Yin
    Shih, Ie-Ming
    Wang, Tza-Huei
    Wang, Tian-Li
    Pisanic, Thomas R., II
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [39] Ovarian Cancer Screening in the High-Risk Population-the UK Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study (UKFOCSS)
    Rosenthal, Adam N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2012, 22 : S27 - S28
  • [40] Randomised trials in ovarian cancer: trial design considerations
    Brady, MF
    Thigpen, JT
    Vermorken, JB
    Parmar, MKB
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 : 75 - 82