Ten Important Considerations for Ovarian Cancer Screening

被引:6
|
作者
Pavlik, Edward J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chandler Med Ctr, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Markey Canc Ctr, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
来源
DIAGNOSTICS | 2017年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
ovarian; cancer; screening; considerations; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; UK COLLABORATIVE TRIAL; STATISTICAL EVIDENCE; REVISED STANDARDS; LYNCH SYNDROME; DOUBLING TIME; SURVIVAL; CARE; IMPACT; BRCA2;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics7020022
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The unique intricacies of ovarian cancer screening and perspectives of different screening methods are presented as ten considerations that are examined. Included in these considerations are: (1) Deciding on the number of individuals to be screened; (2) Anticipating screening group reductions due to death; (3) Deciding on the duration and frequency of screening; (4) Deciding on an appropriate follow-up period after screening; (5) Deciding on time to surgery when malignancy is suspected; (6) Deciding on how screen-detected ovarian cancers are treated and by whom; (7) Deciding on how to treat the data of enrolled participants; (8) Deciding on the most appropriate way to assign disease-specific death; (9) Deciding how to avoid biases caused by enrollments that attract participants with late-stage disease who are either symptomatic or disposed by factors that are genetic, environmental or social; and (10) Deciding whether the screening tool or a screening process is being tested. These considerations are presented in depth along with illustrations of how they impact the outcomes of ovarian cancer screening. The considerations presented provide alternative explanations of effects that have an important bearing on interpreting ovarian screening outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] OVARIAN-CANCER SCREENING
    VANNAGELL, JR
    DEPRIEST, PD
    GALLION, HH
    PAVLIK, EJ
    CANCER, 1993, 71 (04) : 1523 - 1528
  • [22] Is There a Future for Ovarian Cancer Screening?
    Narod, Steven A.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (05) : 611 - 612
  • [23] Screening and detection of ovarian cancer
    Breedlove, G
    Busenhart, C
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2005, 50 (01) : 51 - 54
  • [24] Continuing participation supports ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer
    Pavlik, EJ
    Johnson, TL
    Depriest, PD
    Andrykowski, MA
    Kryscio, RJ
    Van Nagell, JR
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 15 (05) : 354 - 364
  • [25] Psychological and Behavioral Impact of Participation in Ovarian Cancer Screening
    Andrykowski, Michael A.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2017, 7 (01):
  • [26] Colonoscopy Remains an Important Option for Primary Screening for Colorectal Cancer
    Rex, Douglas K.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2024, : 1595 - 1605
  • [27] Ovarian cancer: A review for primary care providers
    Thull, Tessa
    Kempton, Danielle
    JAAPA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS, 2024, 37 (07): : 32 - 36
  • [28] Considerations in the Surgical Management of Ovarian Cancer in the Elderly
    Langstraat, Carrie
    Cliby, William A.
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (01) : 12 - 21
  • [29] Screening for ovarian cancer in the general population
    Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
    Menon, Usha
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 26 (02) : 243 - 256
  • [30] Ovarian Cancer Screening and Early Detection
    Goff, Barbara A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 39 (02) : 183 - +