Aroma development in high pressure treated beef and chicken meat compared to raw and heat treated

被引:68
作者
Schindler, Sabrina [2 ]
Krings, Ulrich [2 ]
Berger, Ralf G. [2 ]
Orlien, Vibeke [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food Sci, Fac Life Sci, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[2] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Food Chem, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
关键词
High pressure; Beef; Chicken; Lipid oxidation; Aroma; WARMED-OVER FLAVOR; LIPID OXIDATION; COOKED CHICKEN; CHILL STORAGE; REFRIGERATED STORAGE; VOLATILE COMPOUNDS; WORKING PRESSURE; ODOR THRESHOLDS; BREAST; MUSCLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.036
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Chicken breast and beef muscle were treated at 400 and 600 MPa for 15 min at 5 degrees C and compared to raw meat and a heated sample (100 degrees C for 15 min). Vacuum-packed beef meat with a smaller fraction of unsaturated fatty acids showed better oxidative stability during 14 days of cold storage, as shown by a low steady-state level of hydroperoxide values, than vacuum-packed chicken meat. Accordingly, the critical pressures of 400 MPa and 600 MPa for chicken breast and beef sirloin, respectively, were established. Volatiles released after opening of the meat bags or during storage of open meat bags, simulating consumer behaviour, were measured under conditions mimicking eating. Quantitative and olfactory analysis of pressurised meat gave a total of 46 flavour volatiles, mainly alcohols (11), aldehydes (15), and ketones (11), but all in low abundance after 14 days of storage. Overall, beef meat contained less volatiles and in lower abundance (factor of 5) compared to chicken meat. The most important odour active volatiles (GC-O) were well below the detection thresholds necessary to impart a perceivable off-flavour. Lipid oxidation was significantly accelerated during 24 h of cold storage in both cooked chicken and beef when exposed to oxygen, while the pressurised and oxygen-exposed chicken and beef meat remained stable. Pressure treatment of beef and chicken did not induce severe changes of their raw aroma profiles. (C) 2010 The American Meat Science Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 323
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Belitz H.-D., 2009, Food Chemistry, V4th, P374
  • [2] Use of antioxidants to minimize rancidity in pressurized and cooked chicken slurries
    Beltran, E
    Pla, R
    Yuste, J
    Mor-Mur, M
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2004, 66 (03) : 719 - 725
  • [3] Lipid oxidation of pressurized and cooked chicken: role of sodium chloride and mechanical processing on TBARS and hexanal values
    Beltran, E
    Pla, R
    Yuste, J
    Mor-Mur, M
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2003, 64 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [4] BLANK I, 1991, FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COFFEE SCIENCE, P117
  • [5] Effect of rosemary on lipid oxidation in pressure-processed, minced chicken breast during refrigerated storage and subsequent heat treatment
    Bragagnolo, N
    Danielsen, B
    Skibsted, LH
    [J]. EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 221 (05) : 610 - 615
  • [6] DETECTABLE ODOR THRESHOLDS OF SELECTED LIPID OXIDATION COMPOUNDS IN A MEAT MODEL SYSTEM
    BREWER, MS
    VEGA, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1995, 60 (03) : 592 - 595
  • [7] CONTRIBUTION OF VOLATILES TO RICE AROMA
    BUTTERY, RG
    TURNBAUGH, JG
    LING, LC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1988, 36 (05) : 1006 - 1009
  • [8] Effect of high pressure treatment on colour, microbial and chemical characteristics of dry cured loin
    Campus, Marco
    Flores, Monica
    Martinez, Antonio
    Toldra, Fidel
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2008, 80 (04) : 1174 - 1181
  • [9] Effect of pressure and holding time on colour, protein and lipid oxidation of sliced dry-cured Iberian ham and loin during refrigerated storage
    Cava, Ramon
    Ladero, Luis
    Gonzalez, Santiago
    Carrasco, Atanasio
    Ramirez, M. Rosario
    [J]. INNOVATIVE FOOD SCIENCE & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, 10 (01) : 76 - 81
  • [10] HIGH-PRESSURE EFFECTS ON LIPID OXIDATION
    CHEAH, PB
    LEDWARD, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 1995, 72 (09) : 1059 - 1063