Marine protected areas, spatial scales, and governance: implications for the conservation of breeding seabirds

被引:57
|
作者
Yorio, Pablo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Ctr Nacl Patagon, RA-9120 Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina
[2] Wildlife Conservat Soc, RA-9120 Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina
来源
CONSERVATION LETTERS | 2009年 / 2卷 / 04期
关键词
Breeding seabirds; conservation tools; fisheries; foraging seabirds; governance; marine protected areas; Patagonia; spatial scales; GOLFO SAN-JORGE; MAGELLANIC PENGUINS; PATAGONIA; MITIGATION; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; POLLUTION; FISHERY; RESERVE; ISLAND;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00062.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
As in many regions worldwide, seabird colonies in Argentina are important conservation targets of marine protected areas (MPAs). Seabirds are wide ranging, often crossing jurisdictional boundaries during foraging. Using a recently designated MPA as a case study, this article discusses the challenges of protecting breeding seabirds given their spatial requirements and use of different jurisdictions. Seabirds breeding at the MPA have distinct foraging strategies. Rock Shags and Olrog's Gulls forage inshore within the MPA. Imperial Cormorants, Magellanic Penguins, and Southern Giant Petrels, in contrast, often feed beyond the MPA's jurisdiction, traveling into provincial, federal, or international waters where they can be affected by fisheries and oil development. This indicates the need of management actions beyond MPA boundaries. The large scale and connectivity of marine ecosystems and the variety of economic pressures require the participation of stakeholders and several government agencies in conservation issues, and thus integrated coastal management and marine spatial planning appear as options to complement the use of MPAs. Although MPAs are a valuable tool to conserve breeding seabirds, increased efforts are needed to design new governance structures and complementary strategies for spatial protection so as to deal with the biological, social, and political complexities of marine systems.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 178
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Best practices for improved governance of coral reef marine protected areas
    Christie, P.
    White, A. T.
    CORAL REEFS, 2007, 26 (04) : 1047 - 1056
  • [32] Change in Governance Modes in Marine Protected Areas that Overlap with Fishing Territories: A Study of Cuba and Brazil
    da Silva, Manuela Dreyer
    Teixeira, Cristina Frutuoso
    Tielves, Raimundo Vento
    da Silva, Christian Luiz
    Ramos, Ania Bustio
    do Nascimento, Decio Estevao
    Heyes, Heather
    LATIN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES, 2024, 51 (03) : 169 - 189
  • [33] Governance analysis of Nha Trang Bay and Cu Lao Cham Marine Protected Areas, Vietnam
    Khuu, Duong T.
    Jones, Peter JS.
    Ekins, Paul
    MARINE POLICY, 2021, 127
  • [34] Evaluating the relative conservation value of fully and partially protected marine areas
    Sciberras, Marija
    Jenkins, Stuart R.
    Mant, Rebecca
    Kaiser, Michel J.
    Hawkins, Stephen J.
    Pullin, Andrew S.
    FISH AND FISHERIES, 2015, 16 (01) : 58 - 77
  • [35] Marine protected areas in spatial property-rights fisheries*
    Costello, Christopher
    Kaffine, Daniel T.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2010, 54 (03) : 321 - 341
  • [36] Marine mammals of Mexico: Richness patterns, protected areas, and conservation trends
    Muzquiz-Villalobos, Mariana
    Pompa-Mansilla, Sandra
    ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2018, 208 : 153 - 160
  • [37] Governance of protected areas: an institutional analysis of conservation, community livelihood, and tourism outcomes
    Nyaupane, Gyan P.
    Poudel, Surya
    York, Abigail
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM, 2022, 30 (11) : 2686 - 2705
  • [38] Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand
    Bennett, Nathan James
    Dearden, Philip
    MARINE POLICY, 2014, 44 : 107 - 116
  • [39] Peace parks and transboundary initiatives: implications for marine conservation and spatial planning
    Mackelworth, Peter
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2012, 5 (02): : 90 - 98
  • [40] Conceptual frameworks and key questions for assessing the contribution of marine protected areas to shark and ray conservation
    Chin, Andrew
    Molloy, Fergus John
    Cameron, Darren
    Day, Jon C.
    Cramp, Jessica
    Gerhardt, Karin Leeann
    Heupel, Michelle R.
    Read, Mark
    Simpfendorfer, Colin A.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2023, 37 (01)