Estimating global ecosystem service values and its response to land surface dynamics during 1995-2015

被引:133
作者
Sannigrahi, Srikanta [1 ]
Bhatt, Sandeep [2 ]
Rahmat, Shahid [1 ]
Paul, Saikat Kumar [1 ]
Sen, Somnath [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Architecture & Reg Planning, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Geol & Geophys, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
关键词
Ecosystem service value; Terrestrial; Coefficient of elasticity; Coefficient of sensitivity; LULC; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COVER; CHINA; CONSERVATION; CONSEQUENCES; VALUATION; LANDSCAPE; FRAMEWORK; DATASETS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.091
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Changes in land use due to the industrial revolution, increasing population, ever-increasing desire for economic growth is a global concern. The aforementioned changes can have a significant impact on global and regional ecosystem services which are indispensable for human well-being and their subsistence. This study identifies several approaches (Costanza et al., de Groot et al., and Xie et al.) to estimate the value of global terrestrial ecosystem services. High resolution (300 m) land use products provided by European Space Agency-Climate Change Initiative (ESA-CCI) were used to quantify the global ecosystem service values (ESV) for 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015 respectively. The coefficient of elasticity (CE) and coefficient of sensitivity (CS) was calculated to compute the response of ESV's corresponding to land use land cover (LULC) change. The results estimated the mean global ESV's (Trillion US$ year(-1)) to be 58.97 in 1995 and 57.76 in 2015, indicating a net loss of ESV (1.21 Trillion US$ year(-1)) during the analysis period (1995-2015) due to depletion of forest cover and wetland/water surface. The overall ESV (Trillion US$ year(-1)) increased in cropland (4.8 in 1995 to 4.9 in 2015) and urban coverage (0.3 in 1995 to 0.59 in 2015) whereas, it reduced substantially in forests (17.59 in 1995 to 17.42 in 2015), grasslands (9.1 in 1995 to 8.9 in 2015), wetland (22.19 in 1995 to 21.11 in 2015) and water bodies (5.29 in 1995 to 5.27). The forestland, wetland, and water bodies are the highest sensitive ecoregions defined by all valuation methods. The current research provides a way to quantify the overall economic loss or gain due to changes in the past, present, and future land use. This will bridge the gap between economic evaluations of current assets concerning the changes in land use. It will also help planners to provide an in-depth thought to the changes in the overall economic value of a particular land use in future (keeping biodiversity in mind) while validating long-term policies concerning to ecological conservation of a country.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 131
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
[11]   Changes in the global value of ecosystem services [J].
Costanza, Robert ;
de Groot, Rudolf ;
Sutton, Paul ;
van der Ploeg, Sander ;
Anderson, Sharolyn J. ;
Kubiszewski, Ida ;
Farber, Stephen ;
Turner, R. Kerry .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 26 :152-158
[12]   Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver [J].
Daily, Gretchen C. ;
Polasky, Stephen ;
Goldstein, Joshua ;
Kareiva, Peter M. ;
Mooney, Harold A. ;
Pejchar, Liba ;
Ricketts, Taylor H. ;
Salzman, James ;
Shallenberger, Robert .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (01) :21-28
[13]   Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making [J].
de Groot, R. S. ;
Alkemade, R. ;
Braat, L. ;
Hein, L. ;
Willemen, L. .
ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (03) :260-272
[14]   Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units [J].
de Groot, Rudolf ;
Brander, Luke ;
van der Ploeg, Sander ;
Costanza, Robert ;
Bernard, Florence ;
Braat, Leon ;
Christie, Mike ;
Crossman, Neville ;
Ghermandi, Andrea ;
Hein, Lars ;
Hussain, Salman ;
Kumar, Pushpam ;
McVittie, Alistair ;
Portela, Rosimeiry ;
Rodriguez, Luis C. ;
ten Brink, Patrick ;
van Beukeringh, Pieter .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2012, 1 (01) :50-61
[15]   Global consequences of land use [J].
Foley, JA ;
DeFries, R ;
Asner, GP ;
Barford, C ;
Bonan, G ;
Carpenter, SR ;
Chapin, FS ;
Coe, MT ;
Daily, GC ;
Gibbs, HK ;
Helkowski, JH ;
Holloway, T ;
Howard, EA ;
Kucharik, CJ ;
Monfreda, C ;
Patz, JA ;
Prentice, IC ;
Ramankutty, N ;
Snyder, PK .
SCIENCE, 2005, 309 (5734) :570-574
[16]   Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results [J].
Friedl, MA ;
McIver, DK ;
Hodges, JCF ;
Zhang, XY ;
Muchoney, D ;
Strahler, AH ;
Woodcock, CE ;
Gopal, S ;
Schneider, A ;
Cooper, A ;
Baccini, A ;
Gao, F ;
Schaaf, C .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 83 (1-2) :287-302
[17]   MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets [J].
Friedl, Mark A. ;
Sulla-Menashe, Damien ;
Tan, Bin ;
Schneider, Annemarie ;
Ramankutty, Navin ;
Sibley, Adam ;
Huang, Xiaoman .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 114 (01) :168-182
[18]   An overview of 21 global and 43 regional land-cover mapping products [J].
Grekousis, George ;
Mountrakis, Giorgos ;
Kavouras, Marinos .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 36 (21) :5309-5335
[19]   Some challenges in global land cover mapping: An assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets [J].
Herold, M. ;
Mayaux, P. ;
Woodcock, C. E. ;
Baccini, A. ;
Schmullius, C. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 112 (05) :2538-2556
[20]   THE ESA CLIMATE CHANGE INITIATIVE Satellite Data Records for Essential Climate Variables [J].
Hollmann, R. ;
Merchant, C. J. ;
Saunders, R. ;
Downy, C. ;
Buchwitz, M. ;
Cazenave, A. ;
Chuvieco, E. ;
Defourny, P. ;
de Leeuw, G. ;
Forsberg, R. ;
Holzer-Popp, T. ;
Paul, F. ;
Sandven, S. ;
Sathyendranath, S. ;
van Roozendael, M. ;
Wagner, W. .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 94 (10) :1541-1552