BOP2: Bayesian optimal design for phase II clinical trials with simple and complex endpoints

被引:78
作者
Zhou, Heng [1 ]
Lee, J. Jack [1 ]
Yuan, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Bayesian adaptive design; early stopping; ordinal endpoint; co-primary endpoints; immunotherapy; MULTIPLE OUTCOMES; 2-STAGE DESIGNS; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1002/sim.7338
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We propose a flexible Bayesian optimal phase II (BOP2) design that is capable of handling simple (e.g., binary) and complicated (e.g., ordinal, nested, and co-primary) endpoints under a unified framework. We use a Dirichlet-multinomial model to accommodate different types of endpoints. At each interim, the go/no-go decision is made by evaluating a set of posterior probabilities of the events of interest, which is optimized to maximize power or minimize the number of patients under the null hypothesis. Unlike other existing Bayesian designs, the BOP2 design explicitly controls the type I error rate, thereby bridging the gap between Bayesian designs and frequentist designs. In addition, the stopping boundary of the BOP2 design can be enumerated prior to the onset of the trial. These features make the BOP2 design accessible to a wide range of users and regulatory agencies and particularly easy to implement in practice. Simulation studies show that the BOP2 design has favorable operating characteristics with higher power and lower risk of incorrectly terminating the trial than some existing Bayesian phase II designs. The software to implement the BOP2 design is freely available at www.trialdesign.org. Copyright (C) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3302 / 3314
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   A Bayesian design for phase II clinical trials with delayed responses based on multiple imputation [J].
Cai, Chunyan ;
Liu, Suyu ;
Yuan, Ying .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (23) :4017-4028
[2]  
Chen TT, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P2701, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19971215)16:23<2701::AID-SIM704>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-1
[4]   Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma [J].
Cheson, Bruce D. ;
Pfistner, Beate ;
Juweid, Malik E. ;
Gascoyne, Randy D. ;
Specht, Lena ;
Horning, Sandra J. ;
Coiffier, Bertrand ;
Fisher, Richard I. ;
Hagenbeek, Anton ;
Zucca, Emanuele ;
Rosen, Steven T. ;
Stroobants, Sigrid ;
Lister, T. Andrew ;
Hoppe, Richard T. ;
Dreyling, Martin ;
Tobinai, Kensei ;
Vose, Julie M. ;
Connors, Joseph M. ;
Federico, Massimo ;
Diehl, Volker .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (05) :579-586
[5]  
EALES JD, 1992, BIOMETRIKA, V79, P13, DOI 10.1093/biomet/79.1.13
[6]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[7]   AN OPTIMAL 3-STAGE DESIGN FOR PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
ENSIGN, LG ;
GEHAN, EA ;
KAMEN, DS ;
THALL, PF .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1994, 13 (17) :1727-1736
[8]   ONE-SAMPLE MULTIPLE TESTING PROCEDURE FOR PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
FLEMING, TR .
BIOMETRICS, 1982, 38 (01) :143-151
[9]  
Heitjan DF, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P1791, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970830)16:16<1791::AID-SIM609>3.3.CO
[10]  
2-5