Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm for central visual field defects unrelated to nerve fiber layer

被引:3
作者
Hirasawa, Kazunori [1 ]
Shoji, Nobuyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Rehabil, Orthopt & Visual Sci,Minami Ku, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2520374, Japan
关键词
SITA; Central visual field defect; Standard automated perimetry; White opacity filter; FULL-THRESHOLD; SITA STANDARD; STRATEGY; PERIMETRY; FASTPAC; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00417-015-3132-x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the characteristic appearance of induced central visual field defects unrelated to the nerve fiber layer on standard automated perimetry using the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA), and to compare the findings to the appearance on existing Full Threshold (FT) and FASTPAC (FP) algorithms. Methods Thirty right eyes of 30 healthy young participants were examined using four Humphrey 24-2 program algorithms: FT, FP, SITA-Standard (SS), and SITA-Fast (SF). Central visual field defects were induced using a high-density white opacity filter centered on a plano lens. The test duration, fovea threshold, mean sensitivity (MS), mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), visual field index (VFI), and defect size and depth were compared among all algorithms. Results The mean test duration was 21 % to 71 % shorter (p<0.01), the fovea threshold 0.9 to 2.6 dB higher (p<0.05), MS 1.1 to 1.7 dB higher (p<0.05), MD 0.84 to 1.48 dB higher, PSD 0.33 to 0.60 lower, and VFI 2 % higher (p<0.05) on SS and SF than on FT and FP. The defect size was approximately four points larger and the defect depth 127 to 156 dB shallower on SS and SF than on FT and FP (p<0.01). Conclusions Central visual field defects unrelated to the nerve fiber layer were wider and shallower and global indices were higher on SITA than on conventional FT and FP. These findings indicate that careful attention is required when converting from FT and FP to SITA.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 854
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Assessment of an effective visual field testing strategy for a normal pediatric population [J].
Akar, Yusuf ;
Yilmaz, Aygen ;
Yucel, Iclal .
OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2008, 222 (05) :329-333
[2]  
Anderson D.R., 1999, Automated static perimetry, V2nd
[3]   Comparison of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and full threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field loss [J].
Aoki, Y. ;
Takahashi, G. ;
Kitahara, K. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 17 (02) :196-202
[4]  
Artes PH, 2002, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V43, P2654
[5]   SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma [J].
Bengtsson, B ;
Heijl, A .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 76 (04) :431-437
[6]   Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies [J].
Bengtsson, B ;
Heijl, A .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 77 (02) :143-146
[7]   Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA standard, SITA fast, and the Humphrey full threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC [J].
Bengtsson, B ;
Heijl, A .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 77 (02) :125-129
[8]  
Bengtsson B, 1997, ACTA OPHTHALMOL SCAN, V75, P368
[9]   Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects [J].
Bengtsson, B ;
Heijl, A ;
Olsson, J .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 76 (02) :165-169
[10]  
Bengtsson B, 1997, PERIMETRY UPDATE 199, P87