How to calculate the life cycle of high-risk medical devices for patient safety

被引:7
作者
Seo, Gihong [1 ]
Park, Sewon [2 ]
Lee, Munjae [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Med Device & Healthcare Solut MEDIPLY, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Ajou Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Humanities & Social Med, Suwon, South Korea
[3] Ajou Univ, Ajou Res Inst Innovat Med, Med Res Collaborating Ctr, Med Ctr, Suwon, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
medical device; product lifecycle management (PLM); service life; medical device regulation; patient safety;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.989320
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In this study, we analyzed Korean and foreign systems, focusing on high-risk medical devices that urgently need to be managed, and we present an life cycle calculation method for determining replacement time. A literature review was conducted to confirm the regulations of the medical device management system and life cycle by country, and a case analysis was performed to verify the replacement evaluation criteria of actual medical institutions. In addition, durability data from the Public Procurement Service, American Hospital Association, and Samsung Medical Center were used to calculate the life cycle of high-risk medical devices. The analysis showed that in the case of Korean and foreign medical device regulatory agencies, there were no specific life cycle regulations for high-risk medical devices. In addition, the important items in the medical device replacement evaluation were found to be the year of introduction, repair cost, component discontinuation, and several failures. On calculating the life cycle of high-risk medical devices revealed that the replacement time is 13 years for anesthesia machines, 14 years for defibrillators, 16 years for heart-lung machines, and 13 years for ventilators. To introduce a uniform medical device replacement standard and life cycle calculation method, the government will need to reorganize the medical device replacement laws and systems. In addition, in the case of medical institutions, it is necessary to secure patient safety by using expert groups to prepare specific life cycle standards that consider the characteristics of medical devices.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Europe's new device regulations fail to protect the public Commercial interests and lack of transparency remain key weaknesses [J].
Allan, Chris ;
Joyce, Thomas J. ;
Pollock, Allyson M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 363
[2]   Optimisation of medical equipment replacement using stochastic dynamic programming [J].
Altalabi, Waleed M. ;
Rushdi, Muhammad A. ;
Tawfik, Bassel M. .
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 2020, 44 (07) :411-422
[3]  
Badnjevi A., 2020, Clinical engineering handbook, P520
[4]   Product life cycle: the evolution of a paradigm and literature review from 1950-2009 [J].
Cao, Hui ;
Folan, Paul .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2012, 23 (08) :641-662
[5]  
Clark TJ, 2008, PRACTICUM BIOMEDICAL, P201
[6]   Safe innovation: On medical device legislation in Europe and Africa [J].
De Maria, Carmelo ;
Di Pietro, Licia ;
Lantada, Andres Diaz ;
Madete, June ;
Makobore, Philippa Ngaju ;
Mridha, Mannan ;
Ravizza, Alice ;
Torop, Janno ;
Ahluwalia, Arti .
HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 7 (02) :156-165
[7]  
Dondelinger Robert M., 2004, Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology, V38, P26, DOI 10.2345/0899-8205(2004)38[26:ACMOER]2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]  
Faisal M., 2015, IOSR Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IOSR-JEEE), V10, P55, DOI [10.9790/1676-10325563, DOI 10.9790/1676-10325563]
[10]   A Framework for Incorporating Patient Preferences Regarding Benefits and Risks into Regulatory Assessment of Medical Technologies [J].
Ho, Martin ;
Saha, Anindita ;
McCleary, K. Kimberly ;
Levitan, Bennett ;
Christopher, Stephanie ;
Zandlo, Kristen ;
Braithwaite, R. Scott ;
Hauber, A. Brett .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (06) :746-750