Child cash benefits and family expenditures: Evidence from the National Child Benefit

被引:28
作者
Jones, Lauren E. [1 ]
Milligan, Kevin [2 ]
Stabile, Mark [3 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Human Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Sch Econ, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE | 2019年 / 52卷 / 04期
关键词
INCOME-TAX CREDIT; WELFARE-REFORM; BOOTSTRAP; HEALTH; IMPACT; MIGRATION;
D O I
10.1111/caje.12409
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Income may improve child outcomes through two mechanisms: as a direct input into health and education, or indirectly, by reducing household financial stress. We exploit policy-induced changes in refundable tax benefit income in Canada to study these two potential mechanisms. Our findings suggest that additional income may improve outcomes through both mechanisms: some benefit income is spent on direct education inputs, while some is spent on everyday items likely to improve the general conditions children face. Additionally, some families reduce spending on risky behaviour items. Spending responses to benefit generosity appear to vary by income and by child age. Resume Prestations pour enfants en especes et depenses des familles : ce que revele la Prestation nationale pour enfants. Le revenu permet d'ameliorer le developpement d'un enfant grace a deux mecanismes : en contribuant directement a l'education et a la sante, et en reduisant indirectement les difficultes financieres au sein du foyer. Afin d'etudier ces deux mecanismes, nous nous appuyons sur les modifications politiques apportees au credit d'impot remboursable de type prestation fiscale pour revenu de travail au Canada. Nos resultats suggerent que par l'entremise de ces deux mecanismes, la situation peut s'ameliorer grace a un revenu additionnel : une partie de ces prestations est depensee directement pour l'education tandis qu'une autre est utilisee pour les biens quotidiens susceptibles d'ameliorer les conditions de vie generales de l'enfant. De plus, certaines familles reduisent les depenses d'articles pouvant induire des comportements a risque. Les types de depenses lies aux prestations sociales semblent varier en fonction des revenus et de l'age des enfants.
引用
收藏
页码:1433 / 1463
页数:31
相关论文
共 56 条
[41]  
Michelmore K., 2013, 2356444 SSRN
[42]   Subsidizing the stork: New evidence on tax incentives and fertility [J].
Milligan, K .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2005, 87 (03) :539-555
[43]  
Milligan K., 2016, CAN TAX J, V64, P601
[44]  
Milligan K., 2015, CANADIAN TAX CREDIT
[45]   The integration of child tax credits and welfare: Evidence from the Canadian National Child Benefit program [J].
Milligan, Kevin ;
Stabile, Mark .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2007, 91 (1-2) :305-326
[46]   Do Child Tax Benefits Affect the Well-being of Children? Evidence from Canadian Child Benefit Expansions [J].
Milligan, Kevin ;
Stabile, Mark .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2011, 3 (03) :175-205
[47]   Child Benefits, Maternal Employment, and Children's Health: Evidence from Canadian Child Benefit Expansions [J].
Milligan, Kevin ;
Stabile, Mark .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (02) :128-132
[48]  
Roodman D., 2015, STAT SOFTWARE COMPON
[49]  
Roodman D., 2018, 1406 QED
[50]   Did the 2001 tax rebate stimulate spending? Evidence from taxpayer surveys [J].
Shapiro, Matthew D. ;
Slemrod, Joel .
Tax Policy and the Economy, Vol 17, 2003, 17 :83-109