Markers of Marijuana Use Outcomes Within Adolescent Substance Abuse Group Treatment

被引:21
作者
Engle, Brett [1 ,2 ]
Macgowan, Mark J. [2 ]
Wagner, Eric F. [2 ,3 ]
Amrhein, Paul C. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Barry Univ, Sch Social Work, Miami Shores, FL 33161 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Community Based Intervent Res Grp, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, Sch Social Work, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[4] Montclair State Univ, Montclair, NJ USA
[5] Columbia Univ, New York State Psychiat Inst, New York, NY USA
关键词
group work; adolescents; substance abuse; group processes; randomized clinical trial; outcome study; GROUP-PSYCHOTHERAPY; THERAPEUTIC ALLIANCE; COPING SKILLS; GROUP CLIMATE; DRUG-ABUSE; THERAPIES; BEHAVIOR; INTERVENTIONS; ALCOHOLISM; DRINKING;
D O I
10.1177/1049731509347855
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objectives: Despite their popularity, little is known about what distinguishes effective from ineffective or even iatrogenic adolescent group interventions. Methods: Audio recordings and transcripts from 19, 8-10 session, school-based treatment groups comprised of 108, substance abusing 10- to 19-year olds were analyzed. Group leader empathy was measured globally, while two new constructs, group commitment and peer response, were measured using discourse analysis. All variables were measured at the group level. Results: Associations among these process variables were tested and supported, as were the hypothesized associations between both group member language constructs and marijuana use outcomes. Conclusions: These findings were consistent with a proposed theoretical model in which group commitment and peer response predict marijuana use outcomes and mediate the effects of group leader empathy. These observable, in-session, verbal behaviors could distinguish whether adolescents in a group intervention will decrease, maintain, or possibly increase the targeted behavior and are likely influenced by group leader empathy.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 282
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Akers R., 1999, Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and Deviance
[2]  
Amrhein P.C., 2004, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, V18, P323
[3]   Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes [J].
Amrhein, PC ;
Miller, WR ;
Yalne, CE ;
Palmer, M ;
Fulcher, L .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 71 (05) :862-878
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Theory and practice of group psychotherapy
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1973, Encounter groups: First facts
[6]   Empirically supported treatments or type I errors? Problems with the analysis of data from group-administered treatments [J].
Baldwin, SA ;
Murray, DM ;
Shadish, WR .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 73 (05) :924-935
[7]   Therapeutic alliance as a predictor of outcome and retention in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study [J].
Barber, JP ;
Luborsky, L ;
Gallop, R ;
Crits-Christoph, P ;
Frank, A ;
Weiss, RD ;
Thase, ME ;
Connolly, MB ;
Gladis, M ;
Foltz, C ;
Siqueland, L .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 69 (01) :119-124
[8]  
BECK AP, 1986, PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC PR, P615
[9]   ''Negative process'': A recurrently discovered and underestimated facet of therapeutic process and outcome in the individual psychotherapy of adults [J].
Binder, JL ;
Strupp, HH .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 1997, 4 (02) :121-139
[10]   Preventing drug abuse in schools: Social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors [J].
Botvin, GJ .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2000, 25 (06) :887-897