A likelihood ratio test for spatial model selection

被引:11
作者
Liu, Tuo [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Lung-fei [3 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Fujian Key Lab Stat Sci, MOE Key Lab Econometr, Dept Stat,Sch Econ, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Wang Yanan Inst Studies Econ, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Econ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Likelihood ratio; Near-epoch dependence; Spatial autoregressive model; Matrix exponential spatial specification; Model selection; AUTOREGRESSIVE MODELS; SEPARATE FAMILIES; SPECIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.07.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper develops a nondegenerate likelihood-ratio test for model selection between two competitive spatial econometrics models. It generalizes the test of Vuong (1989) to models with spatial near-epoch dependent (NED) data. We do not make any structural assumption on the true model specification and allow for the cases where both or one of the two competing models are mis-specified. The test is valid whether two models are nested or non-nested. As a prerequisite of the test, we first show that quasi-maximum likelihood estimators (QMLE) of spatial econometrics models are consistent estimators of their pseudo-true values and are asymptotically normal under regularity conditions. In particular, we study spatial autoregressive models with spatial autoregressive errors (SARAR) and matrix exponential spatial specification (MESS) models. We derive the limiting null distribution of the test statistic. A spatial heteroskedastic and autoregressive consistent estimator of asymptotic variance of the test statistic under the null, which is necessary to implement the test, is constructed. Monte Carlo experiments are designed to investigate finite sample performance of QMLEs for SARAR and MESS models, as well as the size and power of the proposed test. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 458
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An empirical likelihood ratio based goodness-of-fit test for skew normality
    Wei Ning
    Grace Ngunkeng
    Statistical Methods & Applications, 2013, 22 : 209 - 226
  • [42] An exact density-based empirical likelihood ratio test for paired data
    Vexler, Albert
    Gurevich, Gregory
    Hutson, Alan D.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2013, 143 (02) : 334 - 345
  • [43] A self-adjusted weighted likelihood ratio test for global clustering of disease
    Shu, Lianjie
    Zhou, Ruoyu
    Su, Yan
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2016, 86 (05) : 996 - 1009
  • [44] A sequential density-based empirical likelihood ratio test for treatment effects
    Zou, Li
    Vexler, Albert
    Yu, Jihnhee
    Wan, Hongzhi
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (12) : 2115 - 2125
  • [45] On the validity of the likelihood ratio and maximum likelihood methods
    Perlman, MD
    Wu, L
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2003, 117 (01) : 59 - 81
  • [46] Variable Selection for Binary Spatial Regression: Penalized Quasi-Likelihood Approach
    Feng, Wenning
    Sarkar, Abdhi
    Lim, Chae Young
    Maiti, Tapabrata
    BIOMETRICS, 2016, 72 (04) : 1164 - 1172
  • [47] An effect of selection of a smoothing parameter on the performance of likelihood ratio models for solving classification task
    Wlasiuk, Patryk
    Martyna, Agnieszka
    Zadora, Grzegorz
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2015, 144 : 87 - 99
  • [48] Periodic model selection for rainfall using Conditional Maximum Likelihood
    Guenni, L
    Ojeda, F
    Key, MC
    ENVIRONMETRICS, 1998, 9 (04) : 407 - 417
  • [49] Improving Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Bayesian Phylogenetic Model Selection
    Xie, Wangang
    Lewis, Paul O.
    Fan, Yu
    Kuo, Lynn
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2011, 60 (02) : 150 - 160
  • [50] Probability of correct selection from lognormal and convective diffusion models based on the likelihood ratio
    W. G. Strupczewski
    H. T. Mitosek
    K. Kochanek
    V. P. Singh
    S. Weglarczyk
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2006, 20 : 152 - 163