Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy on detection of proximal colon adenomas: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:38
作者
Desai, Madhav [1 ]
Sanchez-Yague, Andre [2 ]
Choudhary, Abhishek [3 ]
Pervez, Asad [1 ]
Gupta, Neil [4 ]
Vennalaganti, Prashanth [1 ]
Vennelaganti, Sreekar [3 ]
Fugazza, Alessandro [5 ]
Repici, Alessandro [5 ]
Hassan, Cesare [5 ]
Sharma, Prateek [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Kansas City, MO USA
[2] Hosp Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain
[3] Veteran Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Kansas City, MO USA
[4] Loyola Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Ist Clin Humanitas, Dept Gastroenterol, Milan, Italy
关键词
LOCATION; RISK; RETROFLEXION; EFFICACY; POLYPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1524
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Proximal colon adenomas can be missed during routine colonoscopy. Use of a cap or hood on the tip of the colonoscope has been shown to improve overall adenoma detection with variable rates. However, it has not been systematically evaluated for detection of proximal colon or right-sided adenomas where the cap may have maximum impact on adenoma detection rate (ADR). Our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy (CC) on right-sided ADRs (r-ADRs) compared with standard colonoscopy (SC). Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases as well as secondary sources (bibliographic review of selected articles and major GI proceedings) were searched through October 1, 2016. Primary outcome was the pooled rate of r-ADR. Detection of flat adenoma, sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P), and number of right-sided adenomas per patient were also assessed. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effect models. Results: Wescreened 686 records and analyzeddata from4 studies (CCgroup, 2546patients; SCgroup, 2547patients) that met criteria for determination of r-ADRs, whereas 6 studies (CC group, 3159 patients; SC group, 3137 patients) were analyzed to estimate right-sided adenomas per patient. r-ADR was significantly higher with CC compared with SC (23% vs 17%; OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.08-2.05; I-2 = 79%; P = .01). CC also improved detection rates of flat adenoma (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.35-3.20; P < .01) and SSA/P (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01-1.74; P = .04). The total number of right-sided adenomas (CC: 1428 [60%] vs SC: 1127 [58%]) and number of right-sided adenomas per patient (CC, .71 +/- .5, vs SC, .65 +/- .62 [mean +/- standard deviation]) were numerically higher for CC but were not statistically significant (P = .43). Approximately 17 CCs would be required to detect an additional patient with right-sided adenoma. Conclusions: Use of CC significantly improves the proximal colon ADR. In addition, flat adenoma and serrated colonic lesion detection rates are also significantly higher as compared with SC.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], J CLIN ONCOL S
  • [2] Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial
    de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R.
    Stoop, Esther M.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    Mathus-Vliegen, Elisabeth M. H.
    Dees, Jan
    Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J.
    van Leerdam, Monique E.
    Fockens, Paul
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    Dekker, Evelien
    [J]. GUT, 2012, 61 (10) : 1426 - 1434
  • [3] Estarli M., 2016, Revista Espaola de Nutricin Humana y Diettica, V20, P148, DOI [https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.20.2.223, DOI 10.14306/RENHYD.20.2.223, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1186/s13643-015-0163-7, DOI 10.1186/S13643-015-0163-7]
  • [4] Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy (CAC) Significantly Extends Visualization in the Right Colon
    Frieling, T.
    Neuhaus, F.
    Heise, J.
    Kreysel, C.
    Huelsdonk, A.
    Blank, M.
    Czypull, M.
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2012, 50 (03): : 279 - 284
  • [5] Miss rate of right-sided colon examination during colonoscopy defined by retroflexion: an observational study
    Hewett, David G.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 74 (02) : 246 - 252
  • [6] Cap-fitted colonoscopy: a randomized, tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates
    Hewett, David G.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 72 (04) : 775 - 781
  • [7] Benefits and Limitations of Cap-Fitted Colonoscopy in Screening Colonoscopy
    Horiuchi, Akira
    Nakayama, Yoshiko
    Kajiyama, Masashi
    Kato, Naoyuki
    Ichise, Yasuyuki
    Tanaka, Naoki
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2013, 58 (02) : 534 - 539
  • [8] New Developments in Mechanical Enhancement of Colonoscopy: Cuffs, Caps and Rings
    Jain, Deepanshu
    Sandhu, Naemat
    Singhal, Shashideep
    [J]. DIGESTION, 2016, 93 (03) : 234 - 247
  • [9] Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level
    Kim, Dong Jun
    Kim, Hyung Wook
    Park, Su Bum
    Kang, Dae Hwan
    Choi, Cheol Woong
    Hong, Joung Boom
    Ji, Byoung Hoon
    Lee, Chang Seok
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (20) : 6261 - 6270
  • [10] Kim H-S, 2013, U EUR GASTROENTER S1, V1, pA85