Policy Uncertainty, Oil Price, Stock Market and Precious Metal Markets Volatility Spillovers in the Russian Economy

被引:0
作者
Sohag, Kazi [1 ]
Husain, Shaiara [2 ]
Chukavina, Kristina [3 ]
Al Mamun, Md [4 ]
机构
[1] Ural Fed Univ, Grad Sch Econ & Management, Lab Int & Reg Econ, Ekaterinburg, Russia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Dept Econ, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Ural Fed Univ, Grad Sch Econ & Management, Ekaterinburg 620075, Russia
[4] La Trobe Univ, Dept Econ & Finance, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
关键词
volatility spillovers; TVP-VAR; policy uncertainty; oil price; exchange rate; metal price; gold price; stock index; silver price; Russian Federation; IMPULSE-RESPONSE ANALYSIS; CRUDE-OIL; IMPLIED VOLATILITY; EXCHANGE-RATE; CO-MOVEMENTS; SAFE HAVEN; SHOCKS; CONNECTEDNESS; GOLD; US;
D O I
10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-2-6
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
The Russian economy is emerging, meaning that natural resources play a dominant role in economic development. Given the considerable volatility in resource prices, we investigate the volatility spillovers among policy uncertainty, international oil prices, exchange rate, stock index and metal prices covering the period of 2 July 2008 to 15 May 2020 for the Russian economy applying Dynamic Connectedness based on Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregression (TVP-VAR). Our empirical investigation demonstrates that gold price, Russian policy uncertainty, oil price and stock index are net volatility contributors, whereas palladium, platinum, silver and exchange rate are net volatilities receivers. Market capitalisation and silver market are found to be the highest net contributor and net receiver, respectively. The palladium appears as a net volatility receiver initially, just after the global financial crisis. The Russian economic policy uncertainty appears to be the dominant volatility contributor from 2008 to 2014, but onward it turned to be a net volatility receiver. Over the year 2014, gold price was the prominent volatility contributor to another market when the oil price dropped significantly. The total connectivity of the markets are highly anchored with several exogenous shocks, including economic sanction, adoption of floating exchange rate, oil price plunge. Our empirical findings provide several policy implications to portfolio managers and Russian regional stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 397
页数:15
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Oil Price Shocks and the Stock Market: Evidence from Japan [J].
Abhyankar, Abhay ;
Xu, Bing ;
Wang, Jiayue .
ENERGY JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (02) :199-222
[2]   Hedging emerging market stock prices with oil, gold, VIX, and bonds: A comparison between DCC, ADCC and GO-GARCH [J].
Abul Basher, Syed ;
Sadorsky, Perry .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 54 :235-247
[3]   Relationship between oil, stock prices and exchange rates: A vine copula based GARCH method [J].
Aloui, Riadh ;
Ben Aissa, Mohamed Safouane .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2016, 37 :458-471
[4]   A time-varying copula approach to oil and stock market dependence: The case of transition economies [J].
Aloui, Riadh ;
Hammoudeh, Shawkat ;
Duc Khuong Nguyen .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 39 :208-221
[5]  
Anjum H., 2019, ROUTLEDGE HDB ENERGY, DOI 10.4324/9781315459653-28
[6]  
Antonakakis N., 2017, Refined measures of dynamic connectedness based on TVP-VAR
[7]   Refined Measures of Dynamic Connectedness based on Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregressions [J].
Antonakakis, Nikolaos ;
Chatziantoniou, Ioannis ;
Gabauer, David .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (04)
[8]   OIL PRICES AND STOCK MARKET CORRELATION: A TIME-VARYING APPROACH [J].
Antonakakis, Nikolaos ;
Filis, George .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY AND STATISTICS, 2013, 1 (01) :17-29
[9]   Dynamic spillovers of oil price shocks and economic policy uncertainty [J].
Antonakakis, Nikolaos ;
Chatziantoniou, Ioannis ;
Filis, George .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 44 :433-447
[10]   Dynamic co-movements of stock market returns, implied volatility and policy uncertainty [J].
Antonakakis, Nikolaos ;
Chatziantoniou, Ioannis ;
Filis, George .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2013, 120 (01) :87-92