The Pizzagame: A virtual public goods game to assess cooperative behavior in children and adolescents

被引:15
作者
Keil, Jan [1 ]
Michel, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Sticca, Fabio [3 ]
Leipold, Kristina [4 ]
Klein, Annette M. [1 ]
Sierau, Susan [1 ]
von Klitzing, Kai [1 ]
White, Lars O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat Psychotherapy &, Liebigstr 20a, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena, Dept Dev Psychol, Jena, Germany
[3] Univ Konstanz, Dept Empir Educ Res, Thurgau Univ Teacher Educ, Constance, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Business & Econ, Dresden, Germany
关键词
Public goods game; Cooperation; Prosocial behavior; Computerized task; Child development; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.3758/s13428-016-0799-9
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Social dilemmas are characterized by conflicts between immediate self-interest and long-term collective goals. Although such conflicts lie at the heart of various challenging social interactions, we know little about how cooperation in these situations develops. To extend work on social dilemmas to child and adolescent samples, we developed an age-appropriate computer task (the Pizzagame) with the structural features of a public goods game (PGG). We administered the Pizzagame to a sample of 191 children 9 to 16 years of age. Subjects were led to believe they were playing the game over the Internet with three sets of two same-aged, same-sex co-players. In fact, the co-players were computer-generated and programmed to expose children to three consecutive conditions: (1) a cooperative strategy, (2) a selfish strategy, and (3) divergent cooperative-selfish strategies. Supporting the validity of the Pizzagame, our results revealed that children and adolescents displayed conditional cooperation, such that their contributions rose with the increasing cooperativeness of their co-players. Age and gender did not influence children and adolescents' cooperative behavior within each condition. However, older children adapted their behavior more flexibly between conditions to parallel the strategies of their co-players. These results support the utility of the Pizzagame as a feasible, reliable, and valid instrument for assessing and quantifying child and adolescent cooperative behavior. Moreover, these findings extend previous work showing that age influences cooperative behavior in the PGG.
引用
收藏
页码:1432 / 1443
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Aguirre-Urreta MI, 2014, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V34, P595
[2]   Does group size matter? Cheating and cooperation in Brazilian school children [J].
Alencar, Anuska Irene ;
Siqueira, Jose de Oliveira ;
Yamamoto, Maria Emilia .
EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2008, 29 (01) :42-48
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, REVEALING INNER WORL
[4]   Experimental economics and deception [J].
Bonetti, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 19 (03) :377-395
[6]  
Cipriani M., 2007, 2768 IZA
[7]   Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction [J].
Colman, AM .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2003, 26 (02) :139-+
[8]   Gender Differences in Preferences [J].
Croson, Rachel ;
Gneezy, Uri .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2009, 47 (02) :448-474
[9]   Social exclusion in middle childhood: Rejection events, slow-wave neural activity, and ostracism distress [J].
Crowley, Michael J. ;
Wu, Jia ;
Molfese, Peter J. ;
Mayes, Linda C. .
SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 5 (5-6) :483-495
[10]   SOCIAL DILEMMAS [J].
DAWES, RM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 31 :169-193