Can abortion rights be integrated into the Women, Peace and Security agenda?

被引:6
作者
Thomson, Jennifer [1 ]
Pierson, Claire [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Polit Languages & Int Relat, Claverton Campus, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Polit, 8-11 Abercromby Sq, Liverpool L69 7WZ, Merseyside, England
关键词
Abortion; UNSCR; 1325; WPS agenda; reproductive rights; CEDAW; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; UNSCR; 1325; GENDER; POWER; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1080/14616742.2017.1413583
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Reproductive rights are an under-theorised aspect of the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda, most clearly typified in United Nations Security Council resolution (UNSCR) 1325 and successive resolutions. Yet reproductive rights are central to women's security, health and human rights. Although they feature in the 2015 Global Study on 1325, there is less reference to reproductive rights, and to abortion specifically, in the suite of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions themselves, nor in the National Action Plans (NAPs, policy documents created by individual countries to outline their implementation plans for 1325). Through content analysis of all resolutions and NAPs produced to date, this article asks where abortion is in the WPS agenda. It argues that the growing centrality of the WPS agenda to women's rights in transitioning societies means that a lack of focus on abortion will marginalize the topic and stifle the development of liberal legalization.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 365
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, FRONTLINES GENDER WA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, Safe abortion: Technical & policy guidance for health systems
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, US NAT ACT PLAN WOM
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, AUSTR NATL ACTION PL
  • [5] [Anonymous], J TRANSNATIONAL LAW
  • [6] Reproductive health: A right for refugees and internally displaced persons
    Austin, Judy
    Guy, Samantha
    Lee-Jones, Louise
    McGinn, Therese
    Schlecht, Jennifer
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2008, 16 (31) : 10 - 21
  • [7] Perpetuating power: some reasons why reproductive health has stalled
    Austveg, Berit
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2011, 19 (38) : 26 - 34
  • [8] Barot S., 2011, Guttmacher Policy Review, V14, P24
  • [9] Bosnia Herzegovina, 2010, ACTION PLAN IMPLEMEN
  • [10] Planning reproductive health in conflict: a conceptual framework
    Busza, J
    Lush, L
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (02) : 155 - 171