Sensory expectations based on product-extrinsic food cues: An interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts

被引:528
作者
Piqueras-Fiszman, Betina [1 ]
Spence, Charles [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Social Sci Grp, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Crossmodal Res Lab, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
关键词
Expectations; Extrinsic cues; Perception; Consumption; Food; Predictive coding; CONSUMER EXPECTATIONS; FLAVOR PERCEPTION; LABEL INFORMATION; COGNITIVE-FACTORS; NUTRITION LABELS; AVERSIVE TASTE; POTATO-CHIPS; FAT-FREE; ACCEPTABILITY; COLOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.013
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
This article constitutes a state-of-the-art review of the literature on the effects of expectations on the sensory perception of food and drink by humans. In the 'Introduction', we summarize the theoretical models of expectations that have been put forward. In the 'Empirical research utilizing direct methods' section, we describe the influence that expectations created by a variety of product extrinsic cues have on sensory perception, hedonic appraisal, and intake/consumption. We critically evaluate the evidence that has emerged from both laboratory studies and real-world research conducted in the setting of the restaurant, canteen, and bar. This literature review is focused primarily on those studies that have demonstrated an effect on tasting. Crucially, this review goes beyond previous work in the area by highlighting the relevant cognitive neuroscience literature (see the section 'Applied research through the lens of cognitive neuroscience methods') and the postulated psychological mechanisms of expectation in terms of recent accounts of predictive coding and Bayesian decision theory (see the 'Predictive coding and expectations' section). (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 179
页数:15
相关论文
共 167 条
[81]   Blindsight: the role of feedforward and feedback corticocortical connections [J].
Lamme, VAF .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2001, 107 (1-3) :209-228
[82]  
Lange C, 1999, FOOD QUAL PREFER, V10, P31, DOI 10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00035-4
[83]   Sustainability and organic production: How information influences consumer's expectation and preference for yogurt [J].
Laureati, M. ;
Jabes, D. ;
Russo, V. ;
Pagliarini, E. .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2013, 30 (01) :1-8
[84]   FOREIGN BRANDING AND ITS EFFECTS ON PRODUCT PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES [J].
LECLERC, F ;
SCHMITT, BH ;
DUBE, L .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1994, 31 (02) :263-270
[85]   Try it, you'll like it: The influence of expectation, consumption, and revelation on preferences for beer [J].
Lee, Leonard ;
Frederick, Shane ;
Ariely, Dan .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (12) :1054-1058
[86]   You taste what you see: Do organic labels bias taste perceptions? [J].
Lee, Wan-chen Jenny ;
Shimizu, Mitsuru ;
Kniffin, Kevin M. ;
Wansink, Brian .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2013, 29 (01) :33-39
[87]   HOW CONSUMERS ARE AFFECTED BY THE FRAMING OF ATTRIBUTE INFORMATION BEFORE AND AFTER CONSUMING THE PRODUCT [J].
LEVIN, IP ;
GAETH, GJ .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1988, 15 (03) :374-378
[88]   Visual influence of shapes and semantic familiarity on human sweet sensitivity [J].
Liang, Pei ;
Roy, Soumyajit ;
Chen, Meng-Ling ;
Zhang, Gen-Hua .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2013, 253 :42-47
[89]   Organic labeling influences food valuation and choice [J].
Linder, N. S. ;
Uhl, G. ;
Fliessbach, K. ;
Trautner, P. ;
Eiger, C. E. ;
Weber, B. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 53 (01) :215-220
[90]   Manipulating basic taste perception to explore how product information affects experience [J].
Litt, Ab ;
Shiv, Baba .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 22 (01) :55-66