Rotational priority investigation in fuzzy analytic hierarchy process design: An empirical study on the marine engine selection problem

被引：17

作者：

Bulut, Emrah ^{[1
]}

Duru, Okan ^{[2
]}

Kocak, Gazi ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Business Adm, Istanbul, Turkey

[2] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Dept Ship & Marine Technol Engn, Izmir, Turkey

[3] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Marine Engn, TR-34940 Istanbul, Turkey

来源：

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING | 2015年 / 39卷 / 02期

关键词：

Fuzzy-AHP; Rational choice theory; Rank reversal; Marine engine; CONSISTENCY INDEX; AHP; PRIORITIZATION; TOPSIS; MODEL;

D O I：

10.1016/j.apm.2014.07.018

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

The aim of this paper is to improve the applicability of the fuzzy-AHP method by using the rotational priority investigation (RPI) method. Despite its popularity and convenience, the AHP and fuzzy-AHP method is criticized by many scholars because of intransitivity and the rank reversal phenomenon. Experts may question the rational choice theory and cross priorities may indicate conflicting interactions. Also, the extraction of a number of alternatives may cause a different order of priorities. The rotational priority investigation method is proposed to investigate sub-group priorities and their corresponding rankings. Every rotation refers to the investigation of sub-group priorities after extraction of an alternative. The final result is based on the normalized average priority among the several rotations. An empirical study is presented by using the RPI method in the fuzzy AHP for the marine engine selection problem in the shipping industry. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：913 / 923

页数：11

共 25 条

[11] A NOTE ON THE ANALYSIS OF SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENT MATRICES [J].

CRAWFORD, G ;

WILLIAMS, C .

JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 29 (04) :387-405

[12] Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment [J].

Dagdeviren, Metin ;

Yavuz, Serkan ;

Kilinc, Nevzat .

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) :8143-8151

[13] Regime switching fuzzy AHP model for choice-varying priorities problem and expert consistency prioritization: A cubic fuzzy-priority matrix design [J].

Duru, Okan ;

Bulut, Emrah ;

Yoshida, Shigeru .

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (05) :4954-4964

[14]

HOLDER RD, 1990, J OPER RES SOC, V41, P1073, DOI 10.1057/jors.1990.167

[15]

Ishizaka A., 2009, OR Insight, V22, P201, DOI 10.1057/ori.2009.10

[16] Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company [J].

Kilincci, Ozcan ;

Onal, Suzan Ash .

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (08) :9656-9664

[17] An analytic hierarchy process and two-sided matching based decision support system for military personnel assignment [J].

Korkmaz, Ibrahim ;

Gokcen, Hadi ;

Cetinyokus, Tahsin .

INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2008, 178 (14) :2915-2927

[18] Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process [J].

Mikhailov, L ;

Tsvetinov, P .

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2004, 5 (01) :23-33

[19]

ROPERLOWE GC, 1990, J OPER RES SOC, V41, P49, DOI 10.1038/sj/jors/0410106

[20]

SAATY Thomas L., 1989, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory, P59, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-50244-6_4, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-50244-6_4, 10.1007/978-3-642-50244-64, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-50244-64]

← 1 2 3 →