Evaluation of the new ARCHITECT rubella IgM assay

被引:3
作者
Eichler, Robert [1 ]
Prostko, John
Fischer, Christian
Hausmann, Michael
Christ, Heike
机构
[1] Abbott GmbH & Co KG, Max Planck Ring 2, D-65205 Wiesbaden, Germany
[2] Abbott Diag, Abbott Pk, IL 60064 USA
关键词
rubella virus; IgM; seroconversion; specificity; interference;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcv.2007.04.009
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Rubella infections are usually characterized by mild self-limiting courses in immunocompetent individuals. However, infections in pregnant women during the first trimester of pregnancy pose a high risk of congenital rubella syndrome possibly resulting in severe defects in the unborn child. Rubella serology of a primary rubella infection is mainly determined by diagnostic confirmation of levels of specific IgM. Study design: Here, we report on the performance of the Rubella IgM assay in development on the ARCHITECT instrument, a fully automated high throughput chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay platform. Sensitivity was examined using commercially available seroconversion panels from vaccinated individuals; specificity was addressed by testing populations of pregnant women, blood donors and hospitalized patients. In addition, the potential for assay interference was evaluated by testing samples of several disease states. As methods of comparison AxSYM, BioMerieux VIDAS and Behring Rubella IgM assays were used. Results: The study demonstrates that the ARCHITECT Rubella IgM assay shows improved specificity compared to AxSYM and Behring. Seroconversion sensitivity is equivalent on all assays evaluated. Conclusion: Together with high throughput, optimized specificity and suppression of rheumatoid factor (RF) interference the ARCHITECT assay provides a useful improvement for the diagnosis of rubella serology. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 187
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EURO SURVEILL
[2]   Rubella [J].
Banatvala, JE ;
Brown, DWG .
LANCET, 2004, 363 (9415) :1127-1137
[3]   Lesson of the week - Interpretation of rubella serology in pregnancy - pitfalls and problems [J].
Best, JM ;
O'Shea, S ;
Tipples, G ;
Davies, N ;
Al-Khusaiby, SM ;
Krause, A ;
Hesketh, LM ;
Jin, L ;
Enders, G .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7356) :147-148
[4]   CONGENITAL VIRUS-INFECTIONS [J].
BEST, JM ;
BANATVALA, JE .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 300 (6733) :1151-1152
[5]  
CDC, 2001, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V50, P1
[6]  
Cutts FT, 1997, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V75, P55
[7]   Evaluation of three immunoassays used for detection of anti-rubella virus immunoglobulin M antibodies [J].
Dimech, W ;
Panagiotopoulos, L ;
Marler, J ;
Laven, N ;
Leeson, S ;
Dax, EM .
CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 12 (09) :1104-1108
[8]  
ENDERS G, 1985, REV INFECT DIS, V7, pS113
[9]  
ENDERS G, 1999, PRAENATAL GEBURSTMED
[10]   The impact of rubella immunization on the serological status of women of childbearing age: A retrospective longitudinal study in Melbourne, Australia [J].
Francis, BH ;
Thomas, AK ;
McCarty, CA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 93 (08) :1274-1276