Two-Year Visual Outcomes of Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for the Correction of Low Myopia

被引:8
作者
Fu, Mengjun [1 ]
Li, Meiyan [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Xian, Yiyong [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Yu, Zhiqiang [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Zhang, Haorun [1 ]
Choi, Joanne [7 ]
Niu, Lingling [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Wang, Xiaoying [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Zhou, Xingtao [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Weifang Eye Hosp, Weifang, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Eye & ENT Hosp, Eye Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Eye & ENT Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, NHC Key Lab Myopia, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Key Lab Myopia, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Shanghai Res Ctr Ophthalmol & Optometry, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[7] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Detroit, MI USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
smile; EVO-ICL; Low myopia; visual quality; aberration; PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR-LENS; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; CENTRAL HOLE; REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; GUIDED LASIK; MODERATE; SMILE; QUALITY; ICL;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2022.780000
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeTo investigate the 2-year visual quality of Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of low myopia. MethodsIn this prospective study, we included 25 eyes of 25 patients (7 men) who underwent EVO-ICL and 36 eyes of 36 patients (16 men) who underwent SMILE between January 2018 and December 2018. Subjective and objective visual outcomes were compared between ICL and SMILE. All patients were followed for 2 years. ResultsAt the postoperative 2-year visit, the percentage of patients with uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) greater than or equal to preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was comparable in the ICL group (80%, 20/25) and SMILE group (88.89%, 32/36). Spherical equivalent (SE) was within +/- 0.50 D in 96% (24/25) of the ICL group and 94.44% (34/36) of the SMILE group. No eyes lost more than 2 lines of CDVA. Postoperative high-order aberrations (HOAs) were significantly increased in the ICL group (p < 0.01) and in the SMILE group (p < 0.01). The most common visual complaint was halo after ICL and starburst after SMILE. There was no correlation between HOAs and visual complaints (p > 0.05). ConclusionEvolution Implantable Collamer Lens provides comparable safety, efficacy, long-term visual stability, and high patient satisfaction when compared to SMILE in correcting low myopia. EVO-ICL could be a favorable alternative for low myopia. Key messages What was known? center dot Visual outcomes of Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL) versus small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for correction of mild myopia remain unclear. What this paper adds? center dot Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL) provides comparable safety, efficacy, long-term visual stability, and high patient satisfaction when compared to small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in correcting low myopia. center dot The most common visual complaint was halo after ICL and starburst after SMILE.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of the Learning Curve on Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction
    Chan, Tommy C. Y.
    Ng, Alex L. K.
    Cheng, George P. M.
    Woo, Victor C. P.
    Zhang, Jiamei
    Wang, Yan
    Jhanji, Vishal
    CORNEA, 2017, 36 (09) : 1044 - 1050
  • [42] Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Hyperopia: 3-Month Refractive and Visual Outcomes
    Reinstein, Dan Z.
    Pradhan, Kishore R.
    Carp, Glenn I.
    Archer, Timothy J.
    Day, Alexander C.
    Sekundo, Walter
    Dhungana, Purushottam
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 35 (01) : 24 - +
  • [43] Comparison of long-term visual quality after keratorefractive lenticule extraction and implantable collamer lens V4c for high myopia
    Zhan, Biyun
    Huang, Yangyi
    Chen, Xun
    Aruma, Aruma
    Cheng, Mingrui
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Zhou, Xingtao
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 50 (11) : 1157 - 1164
  • [44] Five-Year Follow-Up of Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Moderate and High Myopia
    Tian, Mi
    Jian, Weijun
    Miao, Huamao
    Li, Meng
    Xia, Fei
    Zhou, Xingtao
    OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2022, 11 (01) : 355 - 363
  • [45] Comparative Analysis of Visual Outcomes and Complications in Intraocular Collamer Lens, Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction, and Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Surgeries: A Comprehensive Review
    Swaminathan, Uma
    Daigavane, Sachin
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [46] Effective Optical Zone Following Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia Calculated With Two Novel Methods
    Huang, Yangyi
    Ding, Xuan
    Han, Tian
    Fu, Dan
    Yu, Zhiqiang
    Zhou, Xingtao
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 38 (07) : 414 - +
  • [47] A Multicenter Study on Early Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia
    Kamiya, Kazutaka
    Takahashi, Masahide
    Nakamura, Tomoaki
    Kojima, Takashi
    Toda, Ikuko
    Kariya, Maro
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [48] Five-year outcomes of EVO implantable collamer lens implantation for the correction of high myopia and super high myopia
    Xun Chen
    Xuanqi Wang
    Yilin Xu
    Mingrui Cheng
    Tian Han
    LingLing Niu
    Xiaoying Wang
    Xingtao Zhou
    Eye and Vision, 8
  • [49] Outcomes of astigmatic correction with and without two different cyclotorsion compensation methods in small incision lenticule extraction surgery
    Xu, Jiping
    Liu, Manli
    Liu, Quan
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2024, 49
  • [50] One-Year Visual Outcomes and Corneal Higher-Order Aberration Assessment of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for the Treatment of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism
    Payne, Carter J.
    Webster, Courtney R.
    Moshirfar, Majid
    Handlon, Jaiden J.
    Ronquillo, Yasmyne C.
    Hoopes, Phillip C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (21)