共 50 条
Two-Year Visual Outcomes of Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for the Correction of Low Myopia
被引:8
作者:
Fu, Mengjun
[1
]
Li, Meiyan
[2
,3
,4
,5
,6
]
Xian, Yiyong
[2
,3
,4
,5
,6
]
Yu, Zhiqiang
[2
,3
,4
,5
,6
]
Zhang, Haorun
[1
]
Choi, Joanne
[7
]
Niu, Lingling
[2
,3
,4
,5
,6
]
Wang, Xiaoying
[2
,3
,4
,5
,6
]
Zhou, Xingtao
[2
,3
,4
,5
,6
]
机构:
[1] Weifang Eye Hosp, Weifang, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Eye & ENT Hosp, Eye Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Eye & ENT Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, NHC Key Lab Myopia, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Key Lab Myopia, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Shanghai Res Ctr Ophthalmol & Optometry, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[7] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Detroit, MI USA
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
smile;
EVO-ICL;
Low myopia;
visual quality;
aberration;
PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR-LENS;
IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS;
CENTRAL HOLE;
REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES;
CLINICAL-OUTCOMES;
GUIDED LASIK;
MODERATE;
SMILE;
QUALITY;
ICL;
D O I:
10.3389/fmed.2022.780000
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
PurposeTo investigate the 2-year visual quality of Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of low myopia. MethodsIn this prospective study, we included 25 eyes of 25 patients (7 men) who underwent EVO-ICL and 36 eyes of 36 patients (16 men) who underwent SMILE between January 2018 and December 2018. Subjective and objective visual outcomes were compared between ICL and SMILE. All patients were followed for 2 years. ResultsAt the postoperative 2-year visit, the percentage of patients with uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) greater than or equal to preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was comparable in the ICL group (80%, 20/25) and SMILE group (88.89%, 32/36). Spherical equivalent (SE) was within +/- 0.50 D in 96% (24/25) of the ICL group and 94.44% (34/36) of the SMILE group. No eyes lost more than 2 lines of CDVA. Postoperative high-order aberrations (HOAs) were significantly increased in the ICL group (p < 0.01) and in the SMILE group (p < 0.01). The most common visual complaint was halo after ICL and starburst after SMILE. There was no correlation between HOAs and visual complaints (p > 0.05). ConclusionEvolution Implantable Collamer Lens provides comparable safety, efficacy, long-term visual stability, and high patient satisfaction when compared to SMILE in correcting low myopia. EVO-ICL could be a favorable alternative for low myopia. Key messages What was known? center dot Visual outcomes of Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL) versus small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for correction of mild myopia remain unclear. What this paper adds? center dot Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL) provides comparable safety, efficacy, long-term visual stability, and high patient satisfaction when compared to small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in correcting low myopia. center dot The most common visual complaint was halo after ICL and starburst after SMILE.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条