Two-Year Visual Outcomes of Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for the Correction of Low Myopia

被引:8
作者
Fu, Mengjun [1 ]
Li, Meiyan [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Xian, Yiyong [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Yu, Zhiqiang [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Zhang, Haorun [1 ]
Choi, Joanne [7 ]
Niu, Lingling [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Wang, Xiaoying [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Zhou, Xingtao [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Weifang Eye Hosp, Weifang, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Eye & ENT Hosp, Eye Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Eye & ENT Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, NHC Key Lab Myopia, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Key Lab Myopia, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Shanghai Res Ctr Ophthalmol & Optometry, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[7] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Detroit, MI USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
smile; EVO-ICL; Low myopia; visual quality; aberration; PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR-LENS; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; CENTRAL HOLE; REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; GUIDED LASIK; MODERATE; SMILE; QUALITY; ICL;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2022.780000
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeTo investigate the 2-year visual quality of Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of low myopia. MethodsIn this prospective study, we included 25 eyes of 25 patients (7 men) who underwent EVO-ICL and 36 eyes of 36 patients (16 men) who underwent SMILE between January 2018 and December 2018. Subjective and objective visual outcomes were compared between ICL and SMILE. All patients were followed for 2 years. ResultsAt the postoperative 2-year visit, the percentage of patients with uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) greater than or equal to preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was comparable in the ICL group (80%, 20/25) and SMILE group (88.89%, 32/36). Spherical equivalent (SE) was within +/- 0.50 D in 96% (24/25) of the ICL group and 94.44% (34/36) of the SMILE group. No eyes lost more than 2 lines of CDVA. Postoperative high-order aberrations (HOAs) were significantly increased in the ICL group (p < 0.01) and in the SMILE group (p < 0.01). The most common visual complaint was halo after ICL and starburst after SMILE. There was no correlation between HOAs and visual complaints (p > 0.05). ConclusionEvolution Implantable Collamer Lens provides comparable safety, efficacy, long-term visual stability, and high patient satisfaction when compared to SMILE in correcting low myopia. EVO-ICL could be a favorable alternative for low myopia. Key messages What was known? center dot Visual outcomes of Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL) versus small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for correction of mild myopia remain unclear. What this paper adds? center dot Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL) provides comparable safety, efficacy, long-term visual stability, and high patient satisfaction when compared to small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in correcting low myopia. center dot The most common visual complaint was halo after ICL and starburst after SMILE.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Short-term outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for low, medium, and high myopia
    Fernandez, Joaquin
    Valero, Almudena
    Martinez, Javier
    Pinero, David P.
    Rodriuez-Vallejo, Manuel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 27 (02) : 153 - 159
  • [32] Two-year follow-up of posterior corneal elevation after small incision lenticule extraction for moderate myopia
    Azzam, Shaimaa M.
    Shabana, Reham R.
    Elbedewy, Hazem A.
    JOURNAL OF THE EGYPTIAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2025, 118 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [33] Three-Year Results of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for High Myopia: Refractive Outcomes and Aberrations
    Pedersen, Iben Bach
    Ivarsen, Anders
    Hjortdal, Jesper
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 31 (11) : 719 - 725
  • [34] One-Year Results of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in Myopia
    Kunert, K. S.
    Melle, J.
    Sekundo, W.
    Dawczynski, J.
    Blum, M.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2015, 232 (01) : 67 - 71
  • [35] Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for the Correction of High Myopia With Astigmatism
    Reinstein, Dan Z.
    Archer, Timothy J.
    Vida, Ryan S.
    Carp, Glenn I.
    Reinstein, Julia
    McChesney, Theo
    Potter, Joseph G.
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 38 (05) : 262 - +
  • [36] Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantable collamer lens and Toric implantable collamer lens correction for moderate to high myopia and myopic astigmatism
    Bamashmus, Mahfouth A.
    Al-Arabi, Ammar H.
    Alawad, Mohammed A.
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (09) : 913 - 919
  • [37] Visual Outcomes after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for High Myopia
    Yang, Weiming
    Liu, Shengtao
    Li, Meiyan
    Shen, Yang
    Zhou, Xingtao
    OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2020, 63 (04) : 427 - 433
  • [38] Visual outcomes of combined use of implantable collamer lens implantation and laser corneal visual correction for myopia over-18.00 diopters
    Ortega-Usobiaga, Julio
    Gonzalez-Lopez, Felix
    Peng, Yanli
    Bilbao-Calabuig, Rafael
    Beltran-Sanz, Jaime
    Larrubia, Juan Ramon
    Llovet-Osuna, Fernando
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 50 (07) : 733 - 738
  • [39] Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Photorefractive Keratectomy and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Myopia
    Yildirim, Yusuf
    Olcucu, Onur
    Alagoz, Cengiz
    Basci, Abdurrahman
    Agca, Alper
    Yasa, Dilek
    Ozgurhan, Engin Bilge
    Demirok, Ahmet
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 32 (09) : 604 - +
  • [40] Comparison of small incision lenticule extraction and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in terms of visual quality in myopia patients
    Lin, Meng
    Zhou, Haitao
    Hu, Zhongli
    Huang, Jinhai
    Lu, Fan
    Hu, Liang
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2021, 99 (08) : E1289 - E1296