Two-Year Visual Outcomes of Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for the Correction of Low Myopia

被引:8
作者
Fu, Mengjun [1 ]
Li, Meiyan [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Xian, Yiyong [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Yu, Zhiqiang [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Zhang, Haorun [1 ]
Choi, Joanne [7 ]
Niu, Lingling [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Wang, Xiaoying [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Zhou, Xingtao [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Weifang Eye Hosp, Weifang, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Eye & ENT Hosp, Eye Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Eye & ENT Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, NHC Key Lab Myopia, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Key Lab Myopia, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Shanghai Res Ctr Ophthalmol & Optometry, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[7] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Detroit, MI USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
smile; EVO-ICL; Low myopia; visual quality; aberration; PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR-LENS; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; CENTRAL HOLE; REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; GUIDED LASIK; MODERATE; SMILE; QUALITY; ICL;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2022.780000
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeTo investigate the 2-year visual quality of Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of low myopia. MethodsIn this prospective study, we included 25 eyes of 25 patients (7 men) who underwent EVO-ICL and 36 eyes of 36 patients (16 men) who underwent SMILE between January 2018 and December 2018. Subjective and objective visual outcomes were compared between ICL and SMILE. All patients were followed for 2 years. ResultsAt the postoperative 2-year visit, the percentage of patients with uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) greater than or equal to preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was comparable in the ICL group (80%, 20/25) and SMILE group (88.89%, 32/36). Spherical equivalent (SE) was within +/- 0.50 D in 96% (24/25) of the ICL group and 94.44% (34/36) of the SMILE group. No eyes lost more than 2 lines of CDVA. Postoperative high-order aberrations (HOAs) were significantly increased in the ICL group (p < 0.01) and in the SMILE group (p < 0.01). The most common visual complaint was halo after ICL and starburst after SMILE. There was no correlation between HOAs and visual complaints (p > 0.05). ConclusionEvolution Implantable Collamer Lens provides comparable safety, efficacy, long-term visual stability, and high patient satisfaction when compared to SMILE in correcting low myopia. EVO-ICL could be a favorable alternative for low myopia. Key messages What was known? center dot Visual outcomes of Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL) versus small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for correction of mild myopia remain unclear. What this paper adds? center dot Evolution Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL) provides comparable safety, efficacy, long-term visual stability, and high patient satisfaction when compared to small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in correcting low myopia. center dot The most common visual complaint was halo after ICL and starburst after SMILE.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Visual outcomes with implantable Collamer lens versus small incision lenticule extraction in moderate-high myopia: A pilot study
    Sinha, Rajesh
    Daga, Juhi
    Sahay, Pranita
    Gupta, Vinay
    Agarwal, Tushar
    Sharma, Namrata
    Maharana, Prafulla K.
    Khokhar, Sudarshan K.
    Titiyal, Jeewan S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 73 (01) : 115 - 121
  • [2] Vector analysis of small incision lenticule extraction and toric implantable collamer lens implantation for astigmatism correction
    Wan, Ting
    Yin, Houfa
    Wu, Zhiyi
    Yang, Yabo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 31 (03) : 994 - 1001
  • [3] Implantable collamer lens versus small incision lenticule extraction for high myopia correction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cao, Kai
    Zhang, Jingshang
    Wang, Jinda
    Yusufu, Mayinuer
    Jin, Shanshan
    Chen, Shuying
    Wang, Ningli
    Jin, Zi-Bing
    Wan, Xiu Hua
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [4] A meta-analysis of visual outcomes and optical quality after small incision lenticule extraction versus implantable collamer lens for myopia
    Di, Yu
    Cui, Ge
    Li, Ying
    Luo, Yan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 33 (01) : 136 - 144
  • [5] Five-year outcomes of EVO implantable collamer lens implantation for the correction of high myopia and super high myopia
    Chen, Xun
    Wang, Xuanqi
    Xu, Yilin
    Cheng, Mingrui
    Han, Tian
    Niu, LingLing
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Zhou, Xingtao
    EYE AND VISION, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [6] Two-Year Outcomes of Visian Implantable Collamer Lens with a Central Hole for Correcting High Myopia
    Yan, Zhipeng
    Miao, Huamao
    Zhao, Feng
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Chen, Xun
    Li, Meiyan
    Zhou, Xingtao
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 2018
  • [7] One year outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction ReLEX in the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism
    Nicula, Cristina Ariadna
    Nicula, Dorin
    Bolboaca, Sorana D.
    Bulboaca, Adriana Elena
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [8] Outcomes of bioptics with small-incision lenticule extraction as a sequential treatment after implantable collamer lens for management of extreme myopia
    Brar, Sheetal
    Batra, Akanksha
    Shah, Mamta Lakhana
    Ganesh, Sri
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 47 (06) : 741 - 747
  • [9] Visual outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction and implantable collamer lens V4c for moderate myopia: 1-year results
    Aruma Aruma
    Meiyan Li
    Joanne Choi
    Huamao Miao
    Ruoyan Wei
    Danjuan Yang
    Peijun Yao
    Ling Sun
    Xiaoying Wang
    Xingtao Zhou
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2021, 259 : 2431 - 2440
  • [10] Visual outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction and implantable collamer lens V4c for moderate myopia: 1-year results
    Aruma, Aruma
    Li, Meiyan
    Choi, Joanne
    Miao, Huamao
    Wei, Ruoyan
    Yang, Danjuan
    Yao, Peijun
    Sun, Ling
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Zhou, Xingtao
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 259 (08) : 2431 - 2440