Management of isolated femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis

被引:20
作者
Qato, Khalil [1 ]
Conway, Allan M. [1 ]
Mondry, Laurie [1 ]
Giangola, Gary [1 ]
Carroccio, Alfio [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwell Hlth, Lenox Hill Hosp, Div Vasc Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
Femoropopliteal stent; In-stent restenosis; Femoropopliteal occlusive disease; ANGIOPLASTY; BALLOON;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.030
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The optimal catheter-directed therapy for femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains controversial with limited durability. The natural history of untreated ISR is not well characterized. We evaluated the midterm outcomes of patients with asymptomatic isolated femoropopliteal ISR who were observed under a surveillance program. Methods: Patients treated with isolated femoropopliteal stents from January 2009 to December 2013 were retrospectively investigated for the development of ISR. ISR was classified on the basis of duplex ultrasound criteria, with > 50% defined as peak systolic velocity (PSV) twice that of the normal vessel and > 75% as PSV > 400 cm/s or four times the normal PSV. Asymptomatic patients with ISR of > 50% were tracked for progression to high-grade (> 75%) stenosis, occlusion, need for reintervention, and amputation. Results: Asymptomatic ISR of > 50% was identified in 62 (15.3%) of 402 patients with isolated femoropopliteal stents. The mean time for development of ISR was 22.1 (620.1) months. The mean age was 72 (69.7) years, and 34 (55.7%) patients were female. Thirty-one (50%) patients were diabetic, 18 (29.1%) were smokers, and 8 (12.9%) had chronic kidney disease. Indications for treatment were claudication in 49 (79.0%), tissue loss in 9 (14.5%), and rest pain in 4 (6.4%) patients. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) A lesions were treated in 13 (21%) patients, TASC B lesions in 24 (38.7%), and TASC C lesions in 25 (40.3%). Three-vessel runoff was identified in 25 (40.3%) patients, two-vessel runoff in 18 (29.0%), and one-vessel runoff in 19 (30.6%). Under surveillance, ISR of > 50% progressed to > 75% or occlusion in 20 (32.3%) patients. The mean time to progression was 17.4 months, and the mean overall follow-up was 33.1 months. Reintervention was required in 22 (35.0%) patients, with an average of 1.95 (range, 1-4) interventions per patient. Reintervention was undertaken in 19 (86%) patients for claudication and in 3 (18%) patients for critical limb ischemia. One patient required an amputation despite previous reintervention for progression. Progression to > 75% stenosis was predictive of need for reintervention (P=.004). Conclusions: Under a surveillance program, asymptomatic patients with femoropopliteal ISR of > 50% may be observed with a low risk of limb loss. Given the slow rate of progression and the poor durability of reintervention, surveillance with delayed intervention may be warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 810
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Superiority of Stent-Grafts for In-Stent Restenosis in the Superficial Femoral Artery: Twelve-Month Results From a Multicenter Randomized Trial
    Bosiers, Marc
    Deloose, Koen
    Callaert, Joren
    Verbist, Jurgen
    Hendriks, Jeroen
    Lauwers, Patrick
    Schroe, Herman
    Lansink, Wouter
    Scheinert, Dierk
    Schmidt, Andrej
    Zeller, Thomas
    Beschorner, Ulrich
    Noory, Elias
    Torsello, Giovanni
    Austermann, Martin
    Peeters, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2015, 22 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [2] MORPHOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS OF LESION FORMATION AND TIME-COURSE OF SMOOTH-MUSCLE CELL-PROLIFERATION IN A PORCINE PROLIFERATIVE RESTENOSIS MODEL
    CARTER, AJ
    LAIRD, JR
    FARB, A
    KUFS, W
    WORTHAM, DC
    VIRMANI, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1994, 24 (05) : 1398 - 1405
  • [3] Dahl T, 2014, J VASC SURG, V59, P1009
  • [4] Conventional balloon angioplasty versus peripheral cutting balloon angioplasty for treatment of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis: Initial experience
    Dick, Petra
    Sabeti, Schila
    Mlekusch, Wolfgang
    Schlager, Oliver
    Amighi, Jasmin
    Haumer, Markus
    Cejna, Manfred
    Minar, Erich
    Schillinger, Martin
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (01) : 297 - 302
  • [5] Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Standard Balloon for Superficial Femoral Artery In-Stent Restenosis The Randomized Femoral Artery In-Stent Restenosis (FAIR) Trial
    Krankenberg, Hans
    Tuebler, Thilo
    Ingwersen, Maja
    Schlueter, Michael
    Scheinert, Dierk
    Blessing, Erwin
    Sixt, Sebastian
    Kieback, Arne
    Beschorner, Ulrich
    Zeller, Thomas
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2015, 132 (23) : 2230 - 2236
  • [6] Mozaffarian D, 2015, CIRCULATION, V131, pE29, DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152
  • [7] Calloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery
    Schillinger, M
    Sabeti, S
    Loewe, C
    Dick, P
    Amighi, J
    Mlekusch, W
    Schlager, O
    Cejna, M
    Lammer, J
    Minar, E
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (18) : 1879 - 1888
  • [8] Singh GD, 2014, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V55, P325
  • [9] Effect of endovascular stent strut geometry on vascular injury, myointimal hyperplasia, and restenosis
    Sullivan, TM
    Ainsworth, SD
    Langan, EM
    Taylor, S
    Snyder, B
    Cull, D
    Youkey, J
    Laberge, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 36 (01) : 143 - 149
  • [10] Classification and Clinical Impact of Restenosis After Femoropopliteal Stenting
    Tosaka, Atsushi
    Soga, Yoshimitsu
    Iida, Osamu
    Ishihara, Takayuki
    Hirano, Keisuke
    Suzuki, Kenji
    Yokoi, Hiroyoshi
    Nanto, Shinsuke
    Nobuyoshi, Masakiyo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (01) : 16 - 23