Upper bound limit analysis using simplex strain elements and second-order cone programming

被引:295
作者
Makrodimopoulos, A. [1 ]
Martin, C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Engn Sci, Oxford OX1 3PJ, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
limit analysis; upper bound; cohesive-frictional; finite element; optimization; conic programming;
D O I
10.1002/nag.567
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
In geomechanics, limit analysis provides a useful method for assessing the capacity of structures such as footings and retaining walls, and the stability of slopes and excavations. This paper presents a finite element implementation of the kinematic (or upper bound) theorem that is novel in two main respects. First, it is shown that conventional linear strain elements (6-node triangle, 10-node tetrahedron) are suitable for obtaining strict upper bounds even in the case of cohesive-frictional materials, provided that the element sides are straight (or the faces planar) such that the strain field varies as a simplex. This is important because until now, the only way to obtain rigorous upper bounds has been to use constant strain elements combined with a discontinuous displacement field. It is well known (and confirmed here) that the accuracy of the latter approach is highly dependent on the alignment of the discontinuities, such that it can perform poorly if an unstructured mesh is employed. Second, the optimization of the displacement field is formulated as a standard second-order cone programming (SOCP) problem. Using a state-of-the-art SOCP code developed by researchers in mathematical programming, very large example problems are solved with outstanding speed. The examples concern plane strain and the Mohr-Coulomb criterion, but the same approach can be used in 3D with the Drucker-Prager criterion, and can readily be extended to other yield criteria having a similar conic quadratic form. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 865
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   A mixed constant-stress smoothed-strain element with a cubic bubble function for elastoplastic analysis using second-order cone programming [J].
Zhou, Xi-Wen ;
Liu, Feng-Tao ;
Yin, Zhen-Yu ;
Jin, Yin-Fu ;
Zhang, Cheng-Bo .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2022, 145
[32]   Imbalanced data classification using second-order cone programming support vector machines [J].
Maldonado, Sebastian ;
Lopez, Julio .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2014, 47 (05) :2070-2079
[33]   Robust Beamforming With Magnitude Response Constraints Using Iterative Second-Order Cone Programming [J].
Liao, B. ;
Tsui, K. M. ;
Chan, S. C. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 2011, 59 (09) :3477-3482
[34]   Rigid plastic model of incremental sheet deformation using second-order cone programming [J].
Raithatha, A. ;
Duncan, S. R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2009, 78 (08) :955-979
[35]   The Use of Squared Slack Variables in Nonlinear Second-Order Cone Programming [J].
Fukuda, Ellen H. ;
Fukushima, Masao .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2016, 170 (02) :394-418
[36]   Application of Second-Order Cone Programming Theory to Robust Adaptive Beamforming [J].
Zhang, Rong-Yi ;
Song, Hai-Yan .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 CHINESE INTELLIGENT AUTOMATION CONFERENCE: INTELLIGENT INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2015, 336 :405-412
[37]   A second-order cone programming formulation for twin support vector machines [J].
Maldonado, Sebastian ;
Lopez, Julio ;
Carrasco, Miguel .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2016, 45 (02) :265-276
[38]   MISO Beamforming for RFID Systems via Second-Order Cone Programming [J].
Nagy, Betty ;
Fawky, Abdelfattah ;
Khaliel, Maher ;
El-Hadidy, Mohamed ;
Kaiser, Thomas .
2014 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION (EUCAP), 2014, :2808-2811
[39]   The models of bilevel programming with lower level second-order cone programs [J].
Chi, Xiaoni ;
Wan, Zhongping ;
Hao, Zijun .
JOURNAL OF INEQUALITIES AND APPLICATIONS, 2014,
[40]   Stochastic Second-Order Cone Programming in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks [J].
Maggioni, F. ;
Potra, F. A. ;
Bertocchi, M. I. ;
Allevi, E. .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, 143 (02) :309-328