Refractive Outcomes after Cataract Surgery

被引:33
作者
Khoramnia, Ramin [1 ]
Auffarth, Gerd [1 ]
Labuz, Grzegorz [1 ]
Pettit, George [2 ]
Suryakumar, Rajaraman [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Dept Ophthalmol, David J Apple Int Lab Ocular Pathol, Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Alcon Res LLC, Ft Worth, TX 76134 USA
关键词
biometry; refractive outcomes; cataract surgery; intraocular lenses; prediction accuracy; visual acuity; INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; CORNEAL INCISION ENLARGEMENT; AXIAL LENGTH MEASUREMENT; VISUAL-ACUITY; ULTRASOUND BIOMETRY; INDUCED ASTIGMATISM; PATIENT SATISFACTION; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; TARGET REFRACTION; OPTICAL BIOMETRY;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics12020243
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A post-operative manifest refractive error as close as possible to target is key when performing cataract surgery with intraocular lens (TOL) implantation, given that residual astigmatism and refractive errors negatively impact patients' vision and satisfaction. This review explores refractive outcomes prior to modern biometry; advances in biometry and its impact on patients' vision and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery; key factors that affect prediction accuracy; and residual refractive errors and the impact on visual outcomes. There are numerous pre-, intra-, and post-operative factors that can influence refractive outcomes after cataract surgery, leaving surgeons with a small "error budget" (i.e., the source and sum of all influencing factors). To mitigate these factors, precise measurement and correct application of ocular biometric data are required. With advances in optical biometry, prediction of patient post-operative refractory status has become more accurate, leading to an increased proportion of patients achieving their target refraction. Alongside improvements in biometry, advancements in microsurgical techniques, new IOL technologies, and enhancements to IOL power calculations have also positively impacted patients' refractory status after cataract surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [81] Ultrasound Biometry vs. IOL Master
    Roy, Aravind
    Das, Sujata
    Sahu, Srikant K.
    Rath, Suryasnata
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 119 (09) : 1937 - +
  • [82] Comparative analysis of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers
    Sabatino, Francesco
    Matarazzo, Francesco
    Findl, Oliver
    Maurino, Vincenzo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 45 (08) : 1124 - 1129
  • [83] Clinically relevant biometry
    Sahin, Afsun
    Hamrah, Pedram
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 23 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [84] Managing residual refractive error after cataract surgery
    Sales, Christopher S.
    Manche, Edward E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 41 (06) : 1289 - 1299
  • [85] Determination of Personalized IOL-Constants for the Haigis Formula under Consideration of Measurement Precision
    Schroeder, Simon
    Leydolt, Christina
    Menapace, Rupert
    Eppig, Timo
    Langenbucher, Achim
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07):
  • [86] Target refraction for best uncorrected distance and near vision in cataract surgery
    Schuster, Alexander K.
    Schlichtenbrede, Frank C.
    Harder, Bjorn C.
    Beutelspacher, Sven C.
    Jonas, Jost B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 24 (04) : 509 - 515
  • [87] Determining and Comparing the Effective Lens Position and Refractive Outcome of a Novel Rhexis-Fixated Lens to Established Lens Designs
    Shajari, Mehdi
    Sonntag, Ruven
    Niermann, Theresa
    Holland, Detlef
    Kohnen, Thomas
    Priglinger, Siegfried
    Mayer, Wolfgang J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 213 : 62 - 68
  • [88] The influence of varying the number of characters per row on the accuracy and reproducibility of the ETDRS visual acuity chart
    Shamir, Reuben R.
    Friedman, Yael G.
    Joskowicz, Leo
    Mimouni, Michael
    Blumenthal, Eytan Z.
    [J]. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 254 (05) : 971 - 976
  • [89] Effects on IOL Power Calculation and Expected Clinical Outcomes of Axial Length Measurements Based on Multiple vs Single Refractive Indices
    Shammas, H. John
    Shammas, Maya C.
    Jivrajka, Renu, V
    Cooke, David L.
    Potvin, Richard
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 : 1511 - 1519
  • [90] Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer
    Shammas, H. John
    Ortiz, Sergio
    Shammas, Maya C.
    Kim, Seong Hwan
    Chong, Changho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (01) : 50 - 61