Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implant surgery with slim modiolar electrode

被引:38
|
作者
Iso-Mustajarvi, Matti [1 ,2 ]
Sipari, Sini [1 ,2 ]
Lopponen, Heikki [1 ,2 ]
Dietz, Aarno [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, Kuopio 70210, Finland
[2] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Ear Nose & Throat Dis, KNK Klin, Puijonlaaksontie 2, Kuopio 70210, Finland
关键词
Cochlear implant; Hearing preservation; Modiolar electrode; Electro-acoustic stimulation; ANGULAR INSERTION DEPTH; MATRIX SENTENCE TEST; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; EARLY OUTCOMES; LOCATION; IMPACT; ARRAY; STIMULATION; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-019-05708-x
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the insertion results and hearing preservation of a novel slim modiolar electrode (SME) in patients with residual hearing. Methods We retrospectively collected the data from the medical files of 17 patients (18 ears) implanted with a SME. All patients had functional low frequency hearing (PTA ((0.125-0.5 kHz)) <= 80 dB HL). The insertion results were re-examined from the postoperative cone-beam computed tomography scans. Postoperative thresholds were obtained at the time of switch-on of the sound processors (mean 43 days) and at latest follow-up (mean 582 days). The speech recognition in noise was measured with the Finnish matrix sentence test preoperatively and at follow-up. Results The mean insertion depth angle (IDA) was 395 degrees. Neither scala dislocations nor tip fold over were detected. There were no total hearing losses. Functional low-frequency hearing was preserved in 15/18 (83%) ears at switch-on and in 14/17 (82%) ears at follow-up. According to HEARRING classification, 55% (10/18) had complete HP at switch-on and 41% (7/17) still at follow-up. Thirteen patients (14 ears) were initially fitted with electric-acoustic stimulation and seven patients (8 ears) continued to use it after follow-up. Conclusions The preliminary hearing preservation results with the SME were more favorable than reported for other perimodiolar electrodes. The results show that the array may also be feasible for electro-acoustic stimulation; it is beneficial in that it provides adequate cochlear coverage for pure electrical stimulation in the event of postoperative or progressive hearing loss.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 375
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Residual Hearing Preservation with the Evo (R) Cochlear Implant Electrode Array: Preliminary Results
    Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
    Danieli, Fabiana
    de Matos Magalhaes, Ana Tereza
    Gnansia, Dan
    Hoen, Michel
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 20 (04) : 353 - 358
  • [32] A new cochlear implant electrode design for preservation of residual hearing: a temporal bone study
    Skarzynski, Henryk
    Podskarbi-Fayette, Robert
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2010, 130 (04) : 435 - 442
  • [33] Slim Perimodiolar Arrays Are as Effective as Slim Lateral Wall Arrays for Functional Hearing Preservation After Cochlear Implantation
    Woodson, Erika
    Smeal, Molly
    Nelson, Rebecca C.
    Haberkamp, Thomas
    Sydlowski, Sarah
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2020, 41 (06) : E674 - E679
  • [34] Long-term results of hearing preservation cochlear implant surgery in patients with residual low frequency hearing
    Moteki, Hideaki
    Nishio, Shin-ya
    Miyagawa, Maiko
    Tsukada, Keita
    Iwasaki, Satoshi
    Usami, Shin-ichi
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2017, 137 (05) : 516 - 521
  • [35] Hearing Preservation in Elderly Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Bourn, Stephanie
    Goldstein, Mary Rose
    Jacob, Abraham
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2020, 41 (05) : 618 - 624
  • [36] Do different types of cochlear implant electrode influence hearing preservation and speech perception?
    Hallin, Karin
    Larsson, Ulrika
    Schart-Moren, Nadine
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2024, 144 (10) : 552 - 557
  • [37] Intracochlear electrode array position and cochlear implant outcomes using the nucleus slim modiolar electrode and the extended round window approach: a follow-up study
    Klabbers, Tim M.
    Heutink, Floris
    Huinck, Wendy J.
    Van der Woude, Willem-Jan
    Verbist, Berit M.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 279 (10) : 4735 - 4743
  • [38] Residual hearing after a multichannel cochlear implant
    Souza Pinto, F.
    Scaranello-Domingues, C.
    Oliveira, J. A. A.
    Massuda, E. T.
    Isaac, M. L.
    Gaia, T. F.
    Luz, B.
    Machado, A. S.
    Reis, A. C. M.
    Hyppolito, M. A.
    10TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON PAEDIATRIC COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION, 2011, : 77 - 81
  • [39] One-Year Hearing Preservation and Speech Outcomes Comparing Slim Modiolar and Lateral Wall Arrays
    Zhan, Kevin Y.
    Walia, Amit
    Durakovic, Nedim
    Wick, Cameron C.
    Buchman, Craig A.
    Shew, Matthew A.
    Herzog, Jacques A.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2023, 169 (02) : 340 - 347
  • [40] Predicting Acoustic Hearing Preservation Following Cochlear Implant Surgery Using Machine Learning
    Zeitler, Daniel M.
    Buchlak, Quinlan D.
    Ramasundara, Savindi
    Farrokhi, Farrokh
    Esmaili, Nazanin
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2024, 134 (02) : 926 - 936