Monitoring and prediction of porosity in laser powder bed fusion using physics-informed meltpool signatures and machine learning

被引:78
作者
Smoqi, Ziyad [1 ]
Gaikwad, Aniruddha [1 ]
Bevans, Benjamin [1 ]
Kobir, Md Humaun [1 ]
Craig, James [2 ]
Abul-Haj, Alan [3 ]
Peralta, Alonso [4 ]
Rao, Prahalada [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[2] Stratonics, Lake Forest, CA USA
[3] ARA Engn, Albuquerque, NM USA
[4] Honeywell, Charlotte, NC USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Laser powder bed fusion; Porosity prediction; Meltpool monitoring; Imaging pyrometer; Physics-informed machine learning; SPATTER PARTICLES; ENERGY DENSITY; POOL; QUALITY; SIMULATION; PARAMETER; PARTS; PLUME; NEEDS; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117550
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this work we accomplished the monitoring and prediction of porosity in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. This objective was realized by extracting physics-informed meltpool signatures from an in-situ dual-wavelength imaging pyrometer, and subsequently, analyzing these signatures via compu-tationally tractable machine learning approaches. Porosity in LPBF occurs despite extensive optimization of processing conditions due to stochastic causes. Hence, it is essential to continually monitor the process with in -situ sensors for detecting and mitigating incipient pore formation. In this work a tall cuboid-shaped part (10 mm x 10 mm x 137 mm, material ATI 718Plus) was built with controlled porosity by varying laser power and scanning speed. This test caused various types of porosity, such as lack-of-fusion and keyhole formation, with varying degrees of severity in the part. The meltpool was continuously monitored using a dual-wavelength imaging pyrometer installed in the machine. Physically intuitive process signatures, such as meltpool length, temperature distribution, and ejecta (spatter) characteristics, were extracted from the meltpool images. Subse-quently, relatively simple machine learning models, e.g., K-Nearest Neighbors, were trained to predict both the severity and type of porosity as a function of these physics-informed meltpool signatures. These models resulted in a prediction accuracy exceeding 95% (statistical F1-score). The same analysis was carried out with a complex, black-box deep learning convolutional neural network which directly used the meltpool images instead of physics-informed features. The convolutional neural network produced a comparable F1-score in the range of 89-97%. These results demonstrate that using pragmatic, physics-informed meltpool signatures within a simple machine learning model is as effective for flaw prediction in LPBF as using a complex and computationally demanding black-box deep learning model.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Identification and characterization of spatter particles and their effect on surface roughness, density and mechanical response of 17-4 PH stainless steel laser powder-bed fusion parts [J].
Ali, Usman ;
Esmaeilizadeh, Reza ;
Ahmed, Farid ;
Sarker, Dyuti ;
Muhammad, Waqas ;
Keshavarzkermani, Ali ;
Mahmoodkhani, Yahya ;
Marzbanrad, Ehsan ;
Toyserkani, Ehsan .
MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2019, 756 :98-107
[2]   On the limitations of Volumetric Energy Density as a design parameter for Selective Laser Melting [J].
Bertoli, Umberto Scipioni ;
Wolfer, Alexander J. ;
Matthews, Manyalibo J. ;
Delplanque, Jean-Pierre R. ;
Schoenung, Julie M. .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2017, 113 :331-340
[3]   In situ quality control of the selective laser melting process using a high-speed, real-time melt pool monitoring system [J].
Clijsters, S. ;
Craeghs, T. ;
Buls, S. ;
Kempen, K. ;
Kruth, J-P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 75 (5-8) :1089-1101
[4]   Reducing lack of fusion during selective laser melting of CoCrMo alloy: Effect of laser power on geometrical features of tracks [J].
Darvish, K. ;
Chen, Z. W. ;
Pasang, T. .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2016, 112 :357-366
[5]   Additive manufacturing of metallic components - Process, structure and properties [J].
DebRoy, T. ;
Wei, H. L. ;
Zuback, J. S. ;
Mukherjee, T. ;
Elmer, J. W. ;
Milewski, J. O. ;
Beese, A. M. ;
Wilson-Heid, A. ;
De, A. ;
Zhang, W. .
PROGRESS IN MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2018, 92 :112-224
[6]   Reducing near-surface voids in metal (Ti-6Al-4V) powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: the effect of inter-hatch travel time [J].
Diehl, Brett ;
Nassar, Abdalla .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 36
[7]   Process optimization of complex geometries using feed forward control for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing [J].
Druzgalski, C. L. ;
Ashby, A. ;
Guss, G. ;
King, W. E. ;
Roehling, T. T. ;
Matthews, M. J. .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 34
[9]   Physics-informed machine learning and mechanistic modeling of additive manufacturing to reduce defects [J].
Du, Y. ;
Mukherjee, T. ;
DebRoy, T. .
APPLIED MATERIALS TODAY, 2021, 24
[10]   On the effect of spatter particles distribution on the quality of Hastelloy X parts made by laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing [J].
Esmaeilizadeh, Reza ;
Ali, Usman ;
Keshavarzkermani, Ali ;
Mahmoodkhani, Yahya ;
Marzbanrad, Ehsan ;
Toyserkani, Ehsan .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2019, 37 :11-20