Monitoring and prediction of porosity in laser powder bed fusion using physics-informed meltpool signatures and machine learning

被引:62
|
作者
Smoqi, Ziyad [1 ]
Gaikwad, Aniruddha [1 ]
Bevans, Benjamin [1 ]
Kobir, Md Humaun [1 ]
Craig, James [2 ]
Abul-Haj, Alan [3 ]
Peralta, Alonso [4 ]
Rao, Prahalada [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[2] Stratonics, Lake Forest, CA USA
[3] ARA Engn, Albuquerque, NM USA
[4] Honeywell, Charlotte, NC USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Laser powder bed fusion; Porosity prediction; Meltpool monitoring; Imaging pyrometer; Physics-informed machine learning; SPATTER PARTICLES; ENERGY DENSITY; POOL; QUALITY; SIMULATION; PARAMETER; PARTS; PLUME; NEEDS; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117550
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this work we accomplished the monitoring and prediction of porosity in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. This objective was realized by extracting physics-informed meltpool signatures from an in-situ dual-wavelength imaging pyrometer, and subsequently, analyzing these signatures via compu-tationally tractable machine learning approaches. Porosity in LPBF occurs despite extensive optimization of processing conditions due to stochastic causes. Hence, it is essential to continually monitor the process with in -situ sensors for detecting and mitigating incipient pore formation. In this work a tall cuboid-shaped part (10 mm x 10 mm x 137 mm, material ATI 718Plus) was built with controlled porosity by varying laser power and scanning speed. This test caused various types of porosity, such as lack-of-fusion and keyhole formation, with varying degrees of severity in the part. The meltpool was continuously monitored using a dual-wavelength imaging pyrometer installed in the machine. Physically intuitive process signatures, such as meltpool length, temperature distribution, and ejecta (spatter) characteristics, were extracted from the meltpool images. Subse-quently, relatively simple machine learning models, e.g., K-Nearest Neighbors, were trained to predict both the severity and type of porosity as a function of these physics-informed meltpool signatures. These models resulted in a prediction accuracy exceeding 95% (statistical F1-score). The same analysis was carried out with a complex, black-box deep learning convolutional neural network which directly used the meltpool images instead of physics-informed features. The convolutional neural network produced a comparable F1-score in the range of 89-97%. These results demonstrate that using pragmatic, physics-informed meltpool signatures within a simple machine learning model is as effective for flaw prediction in LPBF as using a complex and computationally demanding black-box deep learning model.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A physics-informed machine learning model for porosity analysis in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Liu, Rui
    Liu, Sen
    Zhang, Xiaoli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 113 (7-8): : 1943 - 1958
  • [2] A physics-informed machine learning model for porosity analysis in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Rui Liu
    Sen Liu
    Xiaoli Zhang
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 113 : 1943 - 1958
  • [3] PHYSICS-INFORMED GAUSSIAN PROCESS BASED OPTIMAL CONTROL OF LASER POWDER BED FUSION
    Ren, Yong
    Wang, Qian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME DYNAMIC SYSTEMS AND CONTROL CONFERENCE, DSCC2020, VOL 2, 2020,
  • [4] Architecture-Driven Physics-Informed Deep Learning for Temperature Prediction in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing With Limited Data
    Ghungrad, Suyog
    Faegh, Meysam
    Gould, Benjamin
    Wolff, Sarah J.
    Haghighi, Azadeh
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2023, 145 (08):
  • [5] A machine learning methodology for porosity classification and process map prediction in laser powder bed fusion
    Staszewska, Adrianna
    Patil, Deepali P.
    Dixith, Akshatha C.
    Neamtu, Rodica
    Lados, Diana A.
    PROGRESS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2024, 9 (06) : 1901 - 1911
  • [6] A Physics-Informed Two-Level Machine-Learning Model for Predicting Melt-Pool Size in Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    Ren, Yong
    Wang, Qian
    Michaleris, Panagiotis
    JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2021, 143 (12):
  • [7] Predicting meltpool depth and primary dendritic arm spacing in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using physics-based machine learning
    Riensche, Alex R.
    Bevans, Benjamin D.
    King, Grant
    Krishnan, Ajay
    Cole, Kevin D.
    Rao, Prahalada
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2024, 237
  • [8] Porosity prediction in laser-based powder bed fusion of polyamide 12 using infrared thermography and machine learning
    Hofmann, Joseph
    Li, Ziqi
    Taphorn, Kirsten
    Herzen, Julia
    Wudy, Katrin
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2024, 85
  • [9] Toward prediction and insight of porosity formation in laser welding: A physics-informed deep learning framework
    Meng, Xiangmeng
    Bachmann, Marcel
    Yang, Fan
    Rethmeier, Michael
    ACTA MATERIALIA, 2025, 286
  • [10] Machine-Learning-Based Monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    Yuan, Bodi
    Guss, Gabriel M.
    Wilson, Aaron C.
    Hau-Riege, Stefan P.
    DePond, Phillip J.
    McMains, Sara
    Matthews, Manyalibo J.
    Giera, Brian
    ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 3 (12):