Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy

被引:107
作者
Wang, Benchi [1 ,2 ]
Theeuwes, Jan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Expt & Appl Psychol, Van der Boechorststr 1, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Inst Brain & Behav Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Attentional capture; Suppression; Feature search mode; Statistical regularities; TOP-DOWN; VISUAL-SEARCH; SUPPRESSION; SINGLETONS; POTENTIALS; WINDOW; BRAIN;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-018-1562-3
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
An earlier study using the additional singleton task showed that statistical regularities regarding the distractor location can cause an attentional bias that affects the amount of attentional capture by distractors and the efficiency of selection of targets. The distractor singleton was systematically present more often in one location than in all other locations. The present study investigated whether this bias also occurs when observers adopt a feature search mode, i.e., when they search for a specific feature (circle) between elements with different shapes, while ignoring a colored distractor singleton. It is assumed that in feature search, observers can ignore distractors in a top-down way and as such one expects that statistical regularities about the distractor location should not play a role. Contrary to this prediction, we found that even in feature search, both attentional capture by the distractors and the efficiency of selecting the target were impacted by these statistical regularities. Moreover, statistical regularities regarding the feature value of the distractor (its color) had no effect on the amount of capture or the efficiency of selection. We claim that statistical regularities cause passive lingering biases of attention such that on the priority map, the location containing a high probability distractor competes less for attention than locations that are less likely to contain distractors.
引用
收藏
页码:1763 / 1774
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy [J].
Awh, Edward ;
Belopolsky, Artem V. ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (08) :437-443
[2]   OVERRIDING STIMULUS-DRIVEN ATTENTIONAL CAPTURE [J].
BACON, WF ;
EGETH, HE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1994, 55 (05) :485-496
[3]   The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons [J].
Belopolsky, Artem V. ;
Zwaan, Laura ;
Theeuwes, Jan ;
Kramer, Arthur F. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (05) :934-938
[4]   No capture outside the attentional window [J].
Belopolsky, Artem V. ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
VISION RESEARCH, 2010, 50 (23) :2543-2550
[5]   Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attentional capture [J].
Burnham, Bryan P. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (03) :392-422
[6]   The distractor positivity (Pd) signals lowering of attentional priority: Evidence from event-related potentials and individual differences [J].
Burra, Nicolas ;
Kerzel, Dirk .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 51 (07) :685-696
[7]   Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation [J].
Chun, MM ;
Jiang, YH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (04) :360-365
[8]   Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain [J].
Corbetta, M ;
Shulman, GL .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 3 (03) :201-215
[9]   Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: Evidence from event-related brain potentials [J].
Eimer, Martin ;
Kiss, Monika .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 20 (08) :1423-1433
[10]   Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention [J].
Failing, Michel ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2018, 25 (02) :514-538