What Does Online Mentorship of Secondary Science Students Look Like?

被引:12
作者
Adams, Catrina T. [1 ]
Hemingway, Claire A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Bot Soc Amer St Louis, Missouri & Coordinates Planting Sci Program, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Natl Sci Fdn Arlington, Div Environm Biol, Arlington, VA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
mentoring; science learning; online inquiry; discourse; student-teacher-scientist partnership; MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS;
D O I
10.1093/biosci/biu147
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Mentorship by scientists can enrich learning opportunities for secondary science students, but how scientists perform these roles is poorly documented. We examine a partnership in which plant scientists served as online mentors to teams conducting plant investigations. In our content analysis of 170 conversations, the mentors employed an array of scaffolding techniques (encouraging; helping clarify goals, ideas, and procedures; and supporting reflection), with social discourse centrally embedded and fundamental to the mentoring relationship. The interplay of techniques illustrates that scientist mentors harmonize multiple dimensions of learning and model the integration of science content and practice. The mentors fulfilled self-identified motivation to promote their students' interest and to enculturate students to the science community through online discourse. The patterns of this discourse varied with the mentors' gender, career stage, and team-mentor engagement. These findings address research gaps about the roles, functions, and conceptions of scientists as online mentors; they can be used to guide program facilitation and new research directions.
引用
收藏
页码:1042 / 1051
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[AAAS] American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2013, POW PARTN GUID NSF G
[2]   Research skills and STEM undergraduate research students' aspirations for research careers: Mediating effects of research self-efficacy [J].
Adedokun, Omolola A. ;
Bessenbacher, Ann B. ;
Parker, Loran C. ;
Kirkham, Lisa L. ;
Burgess, Wilella D. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2013, 50 (08) :940-951
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, LEARNING SCI INFORMA, DOI DOI 10.17226/12190
[4]  
Aviv R., 2003, J ASYNCHRONOUS LEARN, V7, P1, DOI [DOI 10.24059/OLJ.V7I3.1842, 10.24059/olj.v7i3.1842]
[5]   How Students Think about Experimental Design: Novel Conceptions Revealed by in-Class Activities [J].
Brownell, Sara E. ;
Wenderoth, Mary Pat ;
Theobald, Roddy ;
Okoroafor, Nnadozie ;
Koval, Mikhail ;
Freeman, Scott ;
Walcher-Chevillet, Cristina L. ;
Crowe, Alison J. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2014, 64 (02) :125-137
[6]   Longitudinal Trends in the Performance of Scientific Peer Reviewers [J].
Callaham, Michael ;
McCulloch, Charles .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 57 (02) :141-148
[7]  
Cawyer C.S., 2002, INT J QUAL STUD EDUC, V15, P225, DOI DOI 10.1080/09518390110111938
[8]  
Collins A., 1991, American Educator, V15, P6, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10833-009-9107-0
[9]  
Deaton C.C., 2012, Journal of College-Science Teaching, V42, P58, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11256-009-0122-5
[10]   Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals [J].
Duschl, Richard .
WHAT COUNTS AS KNOWLEDGE IN EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS: DISCIPLINARY KNOWLEDGE, ASSESSMENT, AND CURRICULUM, 2008, 32 :268-291