Matrix permeability of the confined Floridan Aquifer, Florida, USA

被引:68
作者
Budd, DA
Vacher, HL
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Geol Sci, Boulder, CO 80301 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Geol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
carbonate rocks; heterogeneity; hydraulic properties; Floridan Aquifer;
D O I
10.1007/s10040-004-0341-5
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The Upper Floridan Aquifer of peninsular Florida retains most of its depositional porosity and, as a result, is a multi-porosity aquifer: double porosity (fractured porous aquifer) downdip where the aquifer is confined, and triple porosity (karstic, fractured porous aquifer) in the updip, unconfined region. Matrix permeability in the confined region varies in the range <10(-14.41)-10(-11.1) m(2), as determined by 12,000 minipermeameter measurements on 1,210 m of slabbed core. Limestones divide into 13 textural classes and dolomites into two. Depositional facies (textural class) strongly correlates with matrix permeability. As a result, the facies architecture of the Eocene and Oligocene carbonates that compose the confined portion of the aquifer controls the lateral and vertical distribution of its matrix transmissivity. The most-permeable facies are grainstones (median k, 10(-12.4) m(2)) and sucrosic dolomites (median k, 10(-12.0) m(2)). Together, they are responsible for similar to 73% of the matrix transmissivity of the logged cores, although they constitute only similar to 24% of the thickness. Examination of the flow equations of fractured porous aquifers suggests that the permeability of these two facies is large enough that matrix permeability cannot be discounted in modeling the hydraulics of the double-porosity system. This conclusion likely applies to most, if not all, Cenozoic double-porosity carbonate aquifers, as average matrix and fracture permeabilities in the Floridan Aquifer are similar to other Cenozoic carbonates from around the world.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 549
页数:19
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], IAHS PUBL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1403C US GEOL SURV
[3]   DIFFUSE FLOW AND CONDUIT FLOW IN LIMESTONE TERRAIN IN MENDIP HILLS, SOMERSET (GREAT-BRITAIN) [J].
ATKINSON, TC .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1977, 35 (1-2) :93-110
[4]  
Barenblatt G. I., 1960, PMM-J APPL MATH MEC, V24, P1286, DOI DOI 10.1016/0021-8928(60)90107-6
[5]  
Bear J., 1993, FLOW CONTAMINANT TRA, P1, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-083980-3.50005-X, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-083980-3.50005-X]
[6]   Quantification of macroscopic subaerial exposure features in carbonate rocks [J].
Budd, DA ;
Gaswirth, SB ;
Oliver, WL .
JOURNAL OF SEDIMENTARY RESEARCH, 2002, 72 (06) :917-928
[7]   The relative roles of compaction and early cementation in the destruction of permeability in carbonate grainstones: a case study from the Paleogene of west-central Florida, USA [J].
Budd, DA .
JOURNAL OF SEDIMENTARY RESEARCH, 2002, 72 (01) :116-128
[8]  
Budd DA, 2001, AAPG BULL, V85, P1253
[9]   Principles of early development of karst conduits under natural and man-made conditions revealed by mathematical analysis of numerical models [J].
Dreybrodt, W .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1996, 32 (09) :2923-2935
[10]  
DUERR AD, 1995, 944013 US GEOL SURV