Improved tissue assignment using dual-energy computed tomography in low-dose rate prostate brachytherapy for Monte Carlo dose calculation

被引:5
作者
Cote, Nicolas [1 ]
Bedwani, Stephane [2 ]
Carrier, Jean-Franois [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Phys, Pavillon Roger Gaudry D 428, Montreal, PQ H3T 1J4, Canada
[2] CHUM, Dept Radiooncol, 1560 Rue Sherbrooke Est, Montreal, PQ H2L 4M1, Canada
关键词
dual-energy computed tomography (DECT); metallic artifact; tissue assignment; low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDRB); X-RAY CT; METAL ARTIFACTS; SEED; DOSIMETRY; SEGMENTATION; SIMULATION; REDUCTION; IMPLANTS; RECONSTRUCTION; ATTENUATION;
D O I
10.1118/1.4947486
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: An improvement in tissue assignment for low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDRB) patients using more accurate Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation was accomplished with a metallic artifact reduction (MAR) method specific to dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). Methods: The proposed MAR algorithm followed a four-step procedure. The first step involved applying a weighted blend of both DECT scans (I-H/L) to generate a new image (I-Mix). This action minimized Hounsfield unit (HU) variations surrounding the brachytherapy seeds. In the second step, the mean HU of the prostate in I-Mix was calculated and shifted toward the mean HU of the two original DECT images (I-H/L). The third step involved smoothing the newly shifted I-Mix and the two original I-H/L, followed by a subtraction of both, generating an image that represented the metallic artifact (I-A,((H/L))) of reduced noise levels. The final step consisted of subtracting the original I-H/L from the newly generated I-A,I-(H/L) and obtaining a final image corrected for metallic artifacts. Following the completion of the algorithm, a DECT stoichiometric method was used to extract the relative electronic density (rho(e)) and effective atomic number (Z(eff)) at each voxel of the corrected scans. Tissue assignment could then be determined with these two newly acquired physical parameters. Each voxel was assigned the tissue bearing the closest resemblance in terms of rho(e) and Z(eff), comparing with values from the ICRU 42 database. A MC study was then performed to compare the dosimetric impacts of alternative MAR algorithms. Results: An improvement in tissue assignment was observed with the DECT MAR algorithm, compared to the single-energy computed tomography (SECT) approach. In a phantom study, tissue misassignment was found to reach 0.05% of voxels using the DECT approach, compared with 0.40% using the SECT method. Comparison of the DECT and SECT D-90 dose parameter (volume receiving 90% of the dose) indicated that D-90 could be underestimated by up to 2.3% using the SECT method. Conclusions: The DECT MAR approach is a simple alternative to reduce metallic artifacts found in LDRB patient scans. Images can be processed quickly and do not require the determination of x-ray spectra. Substantial information on density and atomic number can also be obtained. Furthermore, calcifications within the prostate are detected by the tissue assignment algorithm. This enables more accurate, patient-specific MC dose calculations. (C) 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2611 / 2618
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   ENERGY-SELECTIVE RECONSTRUCTIONS IN X-RAY COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY [J].
ALVAREZ, RE ;
MACOVSKI, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1976, 21 (05) :733-744
[2]   Clinical evaluation of the iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm for CT simulation in radiotherapy [J].
Axente, Marian ;
Paidi, Ajay ;
Von Eyben, Rie ;
Zeng, Chuan ;
Bani-Hashemi, Ali ;
Krauss, Andreas ;
Hristov, Dimitre .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (03) :1170-1183
[3]   Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations [J].
Bazalova, Magdalena ;
Carrier, Jean-Francois ;
Beaulieu, Luc ;
Verhaegen, Frank .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (09) :2439-2456
[4]   Report of the Task Group 186 on model-based dose calculation methods in brachytherapy beyond the TG-43 formalism: Current status and recommendations for clinical implementation [J].
Beaulieu, Luc ;
Tedgren, Asa Carlsson ;
Carrier, Jean-Francois ;
Davis, Stephen D. ;
Mourtada, Firas ;
Rivard, Mark J. ;
Thomson, Rowan M. ;
Verhaegen, Frank ;
Wareing, Todd A. ;
Williamson, Jeffrey F. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (10) :6208-6236
[5]   Nanoscale adaptive meshing for rapid STM imaging [J].
Bedwani, Stephane ;
Guibault, Francois ;
Rochefort, Alain .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2008, 227 (14) :6720-6726
[6]   Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT [J].
Beister, Marcel ;
Kolditz, Daniel ;
Kalender, Willi A. .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 28 (02) :94-108
[7]  
Berger M.J., 2010, NIST STANDARD REFERE, V8, DOI DOI 10.18434/T48G6X
[8]  
Boas FE., 2012, IMAGING MED, V4, P229, DOI DOI 10.2217/IIM.12.13
[9]   A stoichiometric calibration method for dual energy computed tomography [J].
Bourque, Alexandra E. ;
Carrier, Jean-Francois ;
Bouchard, Hugo .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (08) :2059-2088
[10]  
Bushberg J. T., 2011, ESSENTIAL PHYS MED I, P171