Higher electrical stimulus intensities are required to activate chronically compressed nerve roots - Implications for intraoperative electromyographic pedicle screw testing

被引:50
作者
Holland, NR
Lukaczyk, TA
Riley, LH
Kostuik, JP
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
electromyography; intraoperative monitoring; pedicle screw; spinal nerve roots;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199801150-00014
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A comparison of the electrical thresholds required to evoke myogenic responses from direct stimulation of normal and chronically compressed nerve roots. Objective, To determine whether intraoperative electromyographic testing to confirm the integrity of instrumented pedicles should be performed at higher stimulus intensities in cases where there is preoperative lumbosacral radiculopathy. Summary of Background Data. Postoperative neurologic deficits may occur as a result of pedicle screw misplacement during spinal instrumentation. The failure to evoke myogenic responses from stimulation of pedicle holes and screws at intensities of 6-8 mA is com monly used to exclude bony pedicular wall perforation. Methods. Direct nerve root stimulation was used to compare the stimulus thresholds of normal and compressed nerve roots in six patients with limb weakness from chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy. Results, The stimulus thresholds of chronically compressed nerve roots significantly exceeded those of normal nerve roots, indicating partial axonal loss (axonotmesis). In most cases, the direct stimulus thresholds of compressed nerve roots exceeded 10 mA. Conclusions. When instrumentation is placed at spinal levels where there is preexisting chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy, holes and screws may need to be stimulated at higher intensities to exclude pedicular perforation and prevent further iatrogenic nerve root injury.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 227
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   STIMULUS-EVOKED EMG MONITORING DURING TRANSPEDICULAR LUMBOSACRAL SPINE INSTRUMENTATION - INITIAL CLINICAL-RESULTS [J].
CALANCIE, B ;
MADSEN, P ;
LEBWOHL, N .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (24) :2780-2786
[2]   VALUE OF NERVE-EXCITABILITY MEASUREMENTS IN PROGNOSIS OF FACIAL PALSY [J].
CAMPBELL, ED ;
NIXON, KH ;
RICHARDSON, AT ;
HICKEY, RP .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1962, 2 (5296) :7-&
[3]   Evoked and spontaneous electromyography to evaluate lumbosacral pedicle screw placement [J].
Clements, DH ;
Morledge, DE ;
Martin, WH ;
Betz, RR .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (05) :600-604
[4]  
Darden BV, 1996, J SPINAL DISORD, V9, P8
[5]   COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE TECHNIQUE OF PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION - A SELECTED SURVEY OF ABS MEMBERS [J].
ESSES, SI ;
SACHS, BL ;
DREYZIN, V .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (15) :2231-2239
[6]  
GILLIATT RW, 1959, P ROY SOC MED, V52, P1080
[7]  
GLASSMAN SD, 1995, SPINE, V20, P1375, DOI 10.1097/00007632-199506000-00008
[8]   RESULTS OF LUMBOSACRAL FUSION FOR DEGENERATIVE DISK DISEASE WITH AND WITHOUT INSTRUMENTATION - 2-YEAR TO 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP [J].
GRUBB, SA ;
LIPSCOMB, HJ .
SPINE, 1992, 17 (03) :349-355
[9]   Continuous electromyographic monitoring to detect nerve root injury during thoracolumbar scoliosis surgery [J].
Holland, NR ;
Kostuik, JP .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (21) :2547-2550
[10]   TRIGGERED ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC THRESHOLD FOR ACCURACY OF PEDICLE SCREW PLACEMENT - AN ANIMAL-MODEL AND CLINICAL CORRELATION [J].
LENKE, LG ;
PADBERG, AM ;
RUSSO, MH ;
BRIDWELL, KH ;
GELB, DE .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (14) :1585-1591