Two-phase model for multi-criteria project ranking: Serbian Railways case study

被引：23

作者：

Mandic, Dragomir ^{[1
]}

Jovanovic, Predrag ^{[1
]}

Bugarinovic, Mirjana ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Transport & Traff Engn, Belgrade 11001, Serbia

来源：

TRANSPORT POLICY | 2014年 / 36卷

关键词：

Two-phase ranking model; Multi-criteria ranking; Railway; Algorithm; TRANSPORT PROJECTS; COST-BENEFIT; FUZZY TOPSIS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.08.002

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

An original two-phase model for ranking railway projects from different railway subsystems is presented. The model was developed for the purpose of ranking 75 Serbian Railways projects. The advantage of this model over existing one-phase models is that it allows for one to obtain not only a unique ranking list of all of the projects but also ranking lists for individual project clusters. The second essential advantage is that the application of this model eliminates the shortcoming of some of the high-ranked projects on the unique ranking list not being high-ranked on the cluster ranking list. Due to the frequency of situations in which projects contain a dualism of interests (e.g., local-global, individual-general, regional-national and national-European), based on the proposed model, a universal model for a two-phase ranking of projects was developed. The algorithm of the new model is presented herein. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：88 / 104

页数：17

共 26 条

[1] Fuzzy TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Applied to Karun Reservoirs System [J].

Afshar, Amin ;

Marino, Miguel A. ;

Saadatpour, Motahareh ;

Afshar, Abbas .

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2011, 25 (02) :545-563

[2] Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods [J].

Amiri, Morteza Pakdin .

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (09) :6218-6224

[3] Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems [J].

Awasthi, Anjali ;

Chauhan, Satyaveer S. ;

Omrani, Hichem .

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (10) :12270-12280

[4] A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty [J].

Awasthi, Anjali ;

Chauhan, S. S. ;

Goyal, S. K. .

MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2011, 53 (1-2) :98-109

[5] Ranking transport projects by their socioeconomic value or financial internal rate of return? [J].

Bonnafous, A ;

Jensen, P .

TRANSPORT POLICY, 2005, 12 (02) :131-136

[6]

Bristow A., 2000, Transport Pol., V7, P51, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00010-X, 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00010-X]

[7]

Buchanan J., 2007, International Transactions in Operational Research, V14, P309, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2007.00589.x

[8] Using ANP priorities with goal programming for revitalization strategies in historic transport: A case study of the Alishan Forest Railway [J].

Chang, Yu-Hern ;

Wey, Wann-Ming ;

Tseng, Hsiao-Yu .

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) :8682-8690

[9]

Cheng-Wei Su, 2006, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, V12, P285

[10]

De Brucker K, 2011, EUR TRANSP, P3

← 1 2 3 →