Bond Behavior of Carbon Fabric-Reinforced Matrix Composites: Geopolymeric Matrix versus Cementitious Mortar

被引:19
作者
Abu Obaida, Feras [1 ]
El-Maaddawy, Tamer [1 ]
El-Hassan, Hilal [1 ]
机构
[1] United Arab Emirates Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, POB 15551, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
关键词
carbon fabric; matrix; bond; slip; geopolymer; cementitious; FRCM MATERIALS; CONCRETE; PERFORMANCE; TESTS; LAP;
D O I
10.3390/buildings11050207
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study aims to examine the potential use of a geopolymeric matrix as a sustainable alternative to commercial mortars in carbon fabric-reinforced matrix composites. Single-lap shear tests were conducted to examine the bond behavior at the fabric-matrix interface. Test parameters included the type of matrix (geopolymeric and cementitious matrices) and the bonded length (50 to 300 mm). The geopolymeric matrix was a blend of fly ash/ground granulated blast furnace slag activated by an alkaline solution of sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide. The bond behavior of the geopolymeric-matrix specimens was characterized and compared to that of similar specimens with a cementitious matrix. The specimens failed due to fabric slippage/debonding at the fabric-matrix interface or fabric rupture. The effective bond lengths of the geopolymeric- and cementitious-matrix specimens were 150 and 170 mm, respectively. The geopolymeric-matrix specimens exhibited higher fabric strains, higher ultimate loads, and a steeper strain profile along the bonded length than those of their cementitious-matrix counterparts. New bond-slip models that characterize the bond behavior at the fabric-matrix interface for geopolymeric- and cementitious-matrix specimens were developed. Both models exhibited equal maximum shear stress of 1.2 MPa. The geopolymeric-matrix model had, however, higher fracture energy and higher slip at maximum shear stress than those of the cementitious matrix model.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
ACI Committee 549, 2020, GUID DES CONSTR EXT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, STANDARD TEST METHOD, DOI DOI 10.1520/C0496_C0496M-17
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ASTM C618-17a
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-Mm] Cube Specimens)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens
[6]  
[Anonymous], S P ARMO MESH
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size, P1, DOI DOI 10.1520/C0469
[8]   A qualification method for externally bonded Fibre Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM) strengthening systems [J].
Ascione, Luigi ;
de Felice, Gianmarco ;
De Santis, Stefano .
COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2015, 78 :497-506
[9]  
ASTM C192/C192M-19, 2019, C192C192M19 ASTM
[10]   Fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix: A promising strengthening technique for concrete structures [J].
Awani, Oluwafunmilayo ;
El-Maaddawy, Tamer ;
Ismail, Najif .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2017, 132 :94-111