Temporary anchorage device insertion variables: effects on retention

被引:39
作者
Petrey, Joseph S.
Saunders, Marnie M. [3 ]
Kluemper, G. Thomas [1 ]
Cunningham, Larry L. [2 ]
Beeman, Cynthia S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Div Orthodont, Coll Dent, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Div Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Coll Dent, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Ctr Biomed Engn, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
关键词
Temporary anchorage device; Mini-implant; Implant failure; Implant retention; Bone; Force to fail; MINI-IMPLANTS; THICKNESS; STABILITY; BONE;
D O I
10.2319/070309-376.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To quantify the influence of temporary anchorage device (TAD) insertion variables on implant retention. Materials and Methods: Three hundred thirty TADs from three companies were placed in synthetic bone replicas at variable depths and angulations and compared. Clinically relevant forces were applied to the TADs until failure of retention occurred. Results: In all three implants, increased insertion depth increased implant retention. As the distance from the abutment head to the cortical plate increased, the retention of all three implants decreased. A significantly greater force to fail was required for a 900 insertion angle than for 45 or 135 insertion angles. No significant difference was found between the 45 and 135 insertion angles. A significant reduction in force to fail occurred when comparing 90 and 45 oblique insertion angles. Conclusions: Increasing penetration depth of TADs results in greater retention. Increased abutment head distance from cortical plate leads to decreased retention. Placement of TADs at 90 to the cortical plate is the most retentive insertion angle. Insertion at an oblique angle from the line of force reduces retention of TADs. (Angle Orthod. 2010;80:634-641.)
引用
收藏
页码:634 / 641
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage [J].
Büchter, A ;
Wiechmann, D ;
Koerdt, S ;
Wiesmann, HP ;
Piffko, J ;
Meyer, U .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2005, 16 (04) :473-479
[2]  
Cheng SJ, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P100
[3]  
Costa A., 2005, SEMIN ORTHOD, V11, P10, DOI DOI 10.1053/j.sodo.2004.11.003
[4]  
Creekmore T D, 1983, J Clin Orthod, V17, P266
[5]   A STUDY OF ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE POSSIBILITIES IN BASAL BONE [J].
GAINSFORTH, BL ;
HIGLEY, LB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND ORAL SURGERY-ORTHODONTICS, 1945, 31 (08) :406-417
[6]   THICKNESS OF FACIAL GINGIVA [J].
GOASLIND, GD ;
ROBERTSON, PB ;
MAHAN, CJ ;
MORRISON, WW ;
OLSON, JV .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1977, 48 (12) :768-771
[7]   Pull-out strength of monocortical screws placed in the maxillae and mandibles of dogs [J].
Huja, SS ;
Litsky, AS ;
Beck, FM ;
Johnson, KA ;
Larsen, PE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 127 (03) :307-313
[8]   Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites [J].
Kim, Hee-Jin ;
Yun, Hee-Sun ;
Park, Hyun-Do ;
Kim, Doo-Hyung ;
Park, Young-Chel .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 130 (02) :177-182
[9]  
Kokich V G, 1996, Semin Orthod, V2, P153, DOI 10.1016/S1073-8746(96)80050-8
[10]   Chincup therapy for a young woman with anterior displacement and obtuse angle of the mandible in Class I malocclusion [J].
Kuroda, T ;
Deguchi, T ;
Kageyama, T ;
Kawahara, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 129 (04) :562-570