An enhanced recovery protocol decreases complication rates in high-risk gynecologic oncology patients undergoing non-emergent laparotomy

被引:1
作者
Boitano, Teresa K. L. [1 ]
Smith, Haller J. [1 ]
Cohen, Alexander C. [2 ]
Todd, Allison [2 ]
Leath, Charles A., III [1 ]
Straughn, J. Michael, Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham HCOP, Div Gynecol Oncol Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
gynecologic surgical procedures; laparotomy; preoperative care; postoperative complications; postoperative care; ERAS(R) SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS; SURGERY ERAS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; OBESE-PATIENTS; GUIDELINES; PATHWAYS; CARE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2020-002270
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective Enhanced recovery protocols are now established as the standard of care leading to improved perioperative outcomes and associated cost-benefits. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of an enhanced recovery program on complication rates in high-risk gynecologic oncology patients undergoing surgery. Methods This retrospective cohort study included gynecologic oncology patients with pathology-proven malignancy undergoing non-emergent laparotomy from October 2016 to December 2018 managed on an enhanced recovery protocol, and a control group from October 2015 through September 2016 prior to enhanced recovery protocol implementation. The primary outcome was complication rates in a high-risk population pre- and post-enhanced recovery protocol. High-risk patients were defined as those with obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m(2)) and/or age >= 65 years. Analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) v.24. Results A total of 363 patients met the inclusion criteria: 104 in the control group and 259 in the enhanced recovery protocol group. Patient demographics, including age, body mass index, diagnosis, and performance status, were similar. Overall complication rates were less in the enhanced recovery protocol group (29% vs 53.8%; p<0.0001). The enhanced recovery protocol group had a shorter length-of-stay compared with control (3.3 vs 4.2 days; p<0.0001). The 30-day readmission rates were similar between the groups (9.6% vs 13.5%; p=0.19). In the enhanced recovery protocol group compared with control, complication rates were less in obese patients (29.4% vs 57.8%; p<0.0001), morbidly obese patients (20.9% vs 76.2%; p<0.0001), and age >= 65 (36.1% vs 57.1%; p<0.0001). The most common complications in the enhanced recovery protocol group were ileus (9.7%), pulmonary complications (2.7%), and blood transfusions (10.8%). Conclusions Implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol decreases complication rates and length-of-stay in morbidly obese and geriatric patients with gynecologic malignancy without an increase in readmission rates.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 726
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery [J].
Adamina, Michel ;
Kehlet, Henrik ;
Tomlinson, George A. ;
Senagore, Anthony J. ;
Delaney, Conor P. .
SURGERY, 2011, 149 (06) :830-840
[2]   Relationship among surgical complexity, short-term morbidity, and overall survival in primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Aletti, Giovanni D. ;
Dowdy, Sean C. ;
Podratz, Karl C. ;
Cliby, William A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) :676.e1-676.e7
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Cancer stat facts: Uterine cancer. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End results program
[4]   Enhanced Recovery Pathways in Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology [J].
Barber, Emma L. ;
Van Le, Linda .
OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2015, 70 (12) :780-792
[5]   Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology: System-wide implementation and audit leads to improved value and patient outcomes [J].
Bisch, S. P. ;
Wells, T. ;
Gramlich, L. ;
Faris, P. ;
Wang, X. ;
Tran, D. T. ;
Thanh, N. X. ;
Glaze, S. ;
Chu, P. ;
Ghatage, P. ;
Nation, J. ;
Capstick, V ;
Steed, H. ;
Sabourin, J. ;
Nelson, G. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 151 (01) :117-123
[6]   Hysterectomy in very obese and morbidly obese patients: a systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies [J].
Blikkendaal, Mathijs D. ;
Schepers, Evelyn M. ;
van Zwet, Erik W. ;
Twijnstra, Andries R. H. ;
Jansen, Frank Willem .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 292 (04) :723-738
[7]   Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on gastrointestinal function in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy [J].
Boitano, Teresa K. L. ;
Smith, Haller J. ;
Rushton, Tullia ;
Johnston, Mary C. ;
Lawson, Prentiss ;
Leath, Charles A., III ;
Xhaja, Anisa ;
Guthrie, Meredith P. ;
Straughn, J. Michael, Jr. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 151 (02) :282-286
[8]   Obesity is associated with increased postoperative complications after operative management of tibial shaft fractures [J].
Burrus, M. Tyrrell ;
Werner, Brian C. ;
Yarboro, Seth R. .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 (02) :465-470
[9]  
CDC, 2018, SEL HLTH COND RISK F
[10]   The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience [J].
Clavien, Pierre A. ;
Barkun, Jeffrey ;
de Oliveira, Michelle L. ;
Vauthey, Jean Nicolas ;
Dindo, Daniel ;
Schulick, Richard D. ;
de Santibanes, Eduardo ;
Pekolj, Juan ;
Slankamenac, Ksenija ;
Bassi, Claudio ;
Graf, Rolf ;
Vonlanthen, Rene ;
Padbury, Robert ;
Cameron, John L. ;
Makuuchi, Masatoshi .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (02) :187-196