Have Chinese cities achieved the win-win between environmental protection and economic development? From the perspective of environmental efficiency

被引:126
作者
Wang, Qunwei [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Zengyao [2 ]
Shen, Neng [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Tiantian [2 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Ctr Chinese Urbanizat Studies, Suzhou 215021, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Sch Business, Suzhou 215021, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental efficiency; Economic development; Heterogeneity decomposition; Meta-frontier DEA; DISTANCE FUNCTION-APPROACH; CO2 EMISSION PERFORMANCE; FUEL POWER-PLANTS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; DEA APPROACH; META-FRONTIER; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; TECHNOLOGY GAPS; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.022
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The development of a regional or national economy is always accompanied by a variety of environmental problems. Using meta-frontier and data envelopment analysis (DEA), this paper investigates the environmental protection mechanisms and economic development of 211 cities in China from the perspective of environmental efficiency. The major conclusions are: (1) the overall environmental efficiency of Chinese cities is low when the most advanced production technology is selected as the reference. Only 10% of cities have achieved a win-win, defined as an effective balance between environmental protection and economic growth. It is possible to increase economy and reduce pollutant emissions at the same time for most of cities. (2) The environmental efficiencies and production technologies of cities in five different groups (based on a widely accepted business index) present significant differences. First-tier cities possess more advanced technology, higher environmental efficiency and, therefore, a higher overall win-win balance between economic development and environmental protection; while the fourth-tier and fifth-tier cities have a relatively large gap between development and protection. (3) To achieve a win-win balance between environmental protection and economic development, the local government of different cities should develop appropriate policies that maximize the use of technology and management practices that enhance both growth and protection. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 158
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1971, AGR DEV INT PERSPECT
[2]   Productivity differences across OECD countries in the presence of environmental constraints [J].
Arcelus, F ;
Arocena, P .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2005, 56 (12) :1352-1362
[3]   Resource and environment efficiency analysis of provinces in China: A DEA approach based on Shannon's entropy [J].
Bian, Yiwen ;
Yang, Feng .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (04) :1909-1917
[4]   Is the environmental performance of industrialized countries converging? A 'SURE' approach to testing for convergence [J].
Camarero, Mariam ;
Picazo-Tadeo, Andres J. ;
Tamarit, Cecilio .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 66 (04) :653-661
[5]   Evaluating economic and environmental efficiency of global airlines: A SBM-DEA approach [J].
Chang, Young-Tae ;
Park, Hyo-soo ;
Jeong, Jae-beom ;
Lee, Jin-woo .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 27 :46-50
[6]   Decomposition of the environmental inefficiency of the meta-frontier with undesirable output [J].
Chiu, Ching-Ren ;
Liou, Je-Liang ;
Wu, Pei-Ing ;
Fang, Chen-Ling .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (05) :1392-1399
[7]   Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach [J].
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 51 (03) :229-240
[8]   Environmental efficiency, productivity and public funds: The case of the Italian agricultural industry [J].
Falavigna, Greta ;
Manello, Alessandro ;
Pavone, Sara .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2013, 121 :73-80
[9]   Environmental performance:: an index number approach [J].
Färe, R ;
Grosskopf, S ;
Hernandez-Sancho, F .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (04) :343-352
[10]  
FARE R, 1989, REV ECON STAT, V71, P90