Robot-assisted abdominal surgery

被引：153

作者：

Gutt, CN ^{[1
]}

Oniu, T ^{[1
]}

Mehrabi, A ^{[1
]}

Kashfi, A ^{[1
]}

Schemmer, P ^{[1
]}

Büchler, MW ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplant Surg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany

来源：

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2004年 / 91卷 / 11期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1002/bjs.4700

中图分类号：

R61 [外科手术学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background: Robotic assistance or telemanipulation is the latest technological advance in minimally invasive surgery. Its future implementation will depend on the advantages that it can provide over standard laparoscopy or open surgery. Method: All Medline-cited papers (from case reports to reviews) about telemanipulators used in visceral surgery were assessed. The data in each paper were analysed to enable an up-to-date review of robot-assisted abdominal surgery by the most advanced telemanipulator (da Vinci(R)). Results: Most papers presented case series demonstrating the feasibility of robotic technology in performing a specific procedure. Comparative studies of robot-assisted surgery versus standard laparoscopic or open surgery were usually matched cohort studies. They generally showed an increased operating time for robot-assisted procedures but with similar rates of conversion, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and mortality in comparison to those of laparoscopic surgery. Consistent long-term follow-up data were missing and only one randomized clinical trial was conducted. Conclusion: Robot-assisted surgery appears safe and feasible for certain standard surgical procedures. However, at its current level of development, it offers no clear, significant advantage over standard laparoscopic techniques.

引用

页码：1390 / 1397

页数：8

共 36 条

[1]

Beninca Gianluca, 2003, Chir Ital, V55, P321

[2] Advantages of using robotic Da Vinci® system for unilateral adrenalectomy:: early results [J].

Brunaud, L ;

Bresler, L ;

Ayav, A ;

Tretou, S ;

Cormier, L ;

Klein, M ;

Boissel, P .

ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 2003, 128 (08) :530-535

[3]

Cadière GB, 2001, WORLD J SURG, V25, P1467

[4] Evaluation of telesurgical (robotic) NISSEN fundoplication [J].

Cadière, GB ;

Himpens, J ;

Vertruyen, M ;

Bruyns, J ;

Germay, O ;

Leman, G ;

Izizaw, R .

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (09) :918-923

[5] Computer-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy with the da Vinci™ surgical robot [J].

Chapman, WH ;

Albrecht, RJ ;

Kim, VB ;

Young, JA ;

Chitwood, WR .

JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 2002, 12 (03) :155-159

[6] Robotic surgical training in an academic institution [J].

Chitwood, WR ;

Nifong, W ;

Chapman, WHH ;

Felger, JE ;

Bailey, BM ;

Ballint, T ;

Mendleson, KG ;

Kim, VB ;

Young, JA ;

Albrecht, RA .

ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 234 (04) :475-484

[7] Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems [J].

Dakin, GF ;

Gagner, M .

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (04) :574-579

[8] Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery [J].

Delaney, CP ;

Lynch, AC ;

Senagore, AJ ;

Fazio, VW .

DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (12) :1633-1639

[9] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy [J].

Desai, MM ;

Gill, IS ;

Kaouk, JH ;

Matin, SF ;

Sung, GT ;

Bravo, EL .

UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (06) :1104-1107

[10]

*FDA, 2000, K990144 FDA DEP HLTH

← 1 2 3 4 →