When is personalized advertising crossing personal boundaries? How type of information, data sharing, and personalized pricing influence consumer perceptions of personalized advertising

被引:25
作者
Boerman, Sophie C. [1 ,3 ]
Kruikemeier, Sanne [1 ]
Bol, Nadine [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun ASCoR, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, Dept Commun & Cognit, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] POB 15791, NL-1001 NG Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR REPORTS | 2021年 / 4卷
关键词
Personalized advertising; Perceptions; Consumer attitudes; Privacy; Resistance; Scenario-based experiment; Data sharing; Personalized pricing; PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP; PRIVACY CONCERNS; ONLINE PRIVACY; TRACKING; PARADOX; STRATEGIES; REACTANCE; KNOWLEDGE; BEHAVIOR; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100144
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We examine the boundary conditions of online personalized advertising by investigating when it is perceived as acceptable and when negative feelings predominate. We conducted a 4 (type of information) x 2 (sharing of information) x 3 (personalized pricing) scenario-based experiment among a representative sample of the Dutch population (N = 1244). Results suggest that, in general, people hold quite negative attitudes towards personalized advertising. Furthermore, ads that use individual-specific and private information (i.e., email content and name), when personal information is shared with other parties, and a higher personalized price all led to lower perceptions of personalized advertising and more resistance to the context (the website), message (the ad), and source (the advertiser). In addition, we find a tipping point: ads that present a higher price based on personal information led to even stronger negative perceptions. For advertisers, our findings imply that boundaries can be crossed in personalizing advertising.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Privacy and human behavior in the age of information [J].
Acquisti, Alessandro ;
Brandimarte, Laura ;
Loewenstein, George .
SCIENCE, 2015, 347 (6221) :509-514
[2]   Unraveling the Personalization Paradox: The Effect of Information Collection and Trust-Building Strategies on Online Advertisement Effectiveness [J].
Aguirre, Elizabeth ;
Mahr, Dominik ;
Grewal, Dhruv ;
de Ruyter, Ko ;
Wetzels, Martin .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2015, 91 (01) :34-49
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SOUPS 12
[4]  
Awad NF, 2006, MIS QUART, V30, P13
[5]   STAY AWAY FROM ME Examining the Determinants of Consumer Avoidance of Personalized Advertising [J].
Baek, Tae Hyun ;
Morimoto, Mariko .
JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2012, 41 (01) :59-76
[6]   How the level of personalization affects the effectiveness of personalized ad messages: the moderating role of narcissism [J].
Bang, Hyejin ;
Choi, Dongwon ;
Wojdynski, Bartosz W. ;
Lee, Yen-, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2019, 38 (08) :1116-1138
[7]   Tracking users' visual attention and responses to personalized advertising based on task cognitive demand [J].
Bang, Hyejin ;
Wojdynski, Bartosz W. .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 55 :867-876
[8]   Personalized charity advertising. Can personalized prosocial messages promote empathy, attitude change, and helping intentions toward stigmatized social groups? [J].
Bartsch, Anne ;
Kloss, Andrea .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2019, 38 (03) :345-363
[9]   The Importance of Trust for Personalized Online Advertising [J].
Bleier, Alexander ;
Eisenbeiss, Maik .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2015, 91 (03) :390-409
[10]   Online Behavioral Advertising: A Literature Review and Research Agenda [J].
Boerman, Sophie C. ;
Kruikemeier, Sanne ;
Borgesius, Frederik J. Zuiderveen .
JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2017, 46 (03) :363-376