Luteal Phase Ovarian Stimulation May Improve Oocyte Retrieval and Oocyte Quality in Poor Ovarian Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: Preliminary Results from a Single-Center Prospective Pilot Study

被引:30
|
作者
Lin, Li-Te [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni [4 ,5 ]
Chen, San-Nung [1 ]
Wen, Zhi-Hong [6 ]
Tsai, Hsiao-Wen [1 ,2 ]
Chern, Chyi-uei [1 ]
Tsui, Kuan-Hao [1 ,2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Shu Zen Jr Coll Med & Management, Dept Nursing, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Univ Catania, Dept Gen Surg & Med Surg Specialties, Catania, Italy
[5] Univ Messina, Unit Gynaecol & Obstet, Dept Human Pathol Adulthood & Childhood G Barresi, Messina, Italy
[6] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Marine Biotechnol & Resources, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[7] Tajen Univ, Coll Pharm & Hlth Care, Dept Pharm, Yanpu Township, Pingtung County, Taiwan
[8] Tajen Univ, Coll Pharm & Hlth Care, Master Program, Yanpu Township, Pingtung County, Taiwan
关键词
Antagonist protocol; Follicular phase ovarian stimulation; Gynecology; Luteal phase ovarian stimulation; Obstetrics; Ovarian reserve; Poor ovarian responders; THAWED EMBRYO-TRANSFER; LIVE BIRTH-RATES; INFERTILE WOMEN; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; PROTOCOLS; HYPERSTIMULATION; RESERVE; MG;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-018-0713-1
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Luteal phase ovarian stimulation (LPOS) has been proven a feasible protocol for infertile patients. High progesterone level in the luteal phase could physiologically inhibit premature luteinizing hormone surge, from which poor ovarian responders (PORs) could obtain benefits. Therefore, we aimed to compare clinical outcomes between LPOS and follicular phase ovarian stimulation (FPOS) protocol in PORs undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). This prospective pilot study was performed at one tertiary center from January 2016 to October 2017. A total of 60 PORs who met Bologna criteria and undergoing IVF were enrolled. Thirty PORs were allocated to the LPOS group and 30 PORs were allocated to the FPOS group. Basic characteristics, cycle characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups. The length of stimulation was significantly longer in the LPOS group than in the FPOS group. The numbers of retrieved oocytes, metaphase II oocytes, fertilized oocytes, and day-3 embryos were significantly higher in the LPOS group than in the FPOS group. Conversely, we could not find any significant difference for clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, abortion rate, and cancellation rate. The multivariate analysis showed that only LPOS (p = 0.007) was significantly associated the possibility to retrieve three or more oocytes, whereas basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) < 8 IU/l (p = 0.103) and antral follicle count (AFC) ae<yen> 3 (p = 0.143) did not significantly affect this event. LPOS allows improved oocyte retrieval and oocyte quality in PORs with respect to FPOS, despite comparable pregnancy outcomes. LPOS may be considered a feasible option for oocytes accumulation in PORs. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03238833.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 856
页数:10
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Luteal Phase Ovarian Stimulation May Improve Oocyte Retrieval and Oocyte Quality in Poor Ovarian Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: Preliminary Results from a Single-Center Prospective Pilot Study
    Li-Te Lin
    Salvatore Giovanni Vitale
    San-Nung Chen
    Zhi-Hong Wen
    Hsiao-Wen Tsai
    Chyi-uei Chern
    Kuan-Hao Tsui
    Advances in Therapy, 2018, 35 : 847 - 856
  • [2] Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders?
    Zhang, John
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 13
  • [3] Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders?
    John Zhang
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 13
  • [4] The use of luteal-phase ovarian stimulation for poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer treatment
    Lin, Li-Te
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    Tsui, Kuan-Hao
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 55 (03): : 307 - 308
  • [5] Effects of low LH serum levels on oocyte retrieval, fertilization rate and embryo quality during controlled ovarian stimulation: results from a prospective cohort analysis
    Dragotto, Jessica
    Buzzaccarini, Giovanni
    Etrusco, Andrea
    Lagana, Antonio Simone
    Venezia, Renato
    Terzic, Sanja
    Dellino, Miriam
    Margioula-Siarkou, Chrysoula
    Unfer, Vittorio
    Bianco, Bianca
    Casadio, Paolo
    Bracchitta, Giovanni
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2024, 89 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [6] Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer treatment compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study
    Wei, Li-Hong
    Ma, Wen-Hong
    Tang, Ni
    Wei, Ji-Hong
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 55 (01): : 50 - 54
  • [7] Is polycystic ovarian morphology related to a poor oocyte quality after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection? Results from a prospective, comparative study
    Sigala, Julien
    Sifer, Christophe
    Dewailly, Didier
    Robin, Geoffroy
    Bruyneel, Aude
    Ramdane, Nassima
    Lefebvre-Khalil, Valerie
    Mitchell, Valerie
    Decanter, Christine
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (01) : 112 - 118
  • [8] Follicular synchronization using transdermal estradiol patch and GnRH antagonists in the luteal phase; does it increase oocyte yield in poor responders to gonadotropin stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF)? A comparative study with microdose flare-up protocol
    Ata, Baris
    Zeng, Xing
    Son, Weon Y.
    Holzer, Hananel
    Tan, Seang L.
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2011, 27 (11) : 876 - 879