Simulation of eye-tracker latency, spot size, and ablation pulse depth on the correction of higher order wavefront aberrations with scanning spot laser systems

被引:0
作者
Bueeler, M
Mrochen, M
机构
[1] ETH, Inst Biomed Engn, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Inst Refract & Oculoplast Surg, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: The aim of this theoretical work was to investigate the robustness of scanning spot laser treatments with different laser spot diameters and peak ablation depths in case of incomplete compensation of eye movements due to eye-tracker latency. METHODS: Scanning spot corrections of 3rd to 5th Zernike order wavefront errors were numerically simulated. Measured eye-movement data were used to calculate the positioning error of each laser shot assuming eye-tracker latencies of 0, 5, 30, and 100 ms, and for the case of no eye tracking. The single spot ablation depth ranged from 0.25 to 1.0 mum and the spot diameter from 250 to 1000 pm. The quality of the ablation was rated by the postoperative surface variance and the Strehl intensity ratio, which was calculated after a low-pass filter was applied to simulate epithelial surface smoothing. RESULTS: Treatments performed with nearly ideal eye tracking (latency similar to 0) provide the best results with a small laser spot (0.25 mm) and a small ablation depth (250 mum). However, combinations of a large spot diameter (1000 mum) and a small ablation depth per pulse (0.25 mum) yield the better results for latencies above a certain threshold to be determined specifically. Treatments performed with tracker latencies in the order of 100 ms yield similar results as treatments done completely without eye-movement compensation. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of spot diameter was shown to make the correction more susceptible to eye movement induced error. A smaller spot size is only beneficial when eye movement is neutralized with a tracking system with a latency <5 ms.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 36
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Atchison David A., 2000, OPTICS HUMAN EYE, V35
[2]   Corneal topographic evaluation of decentration in photorefractive keratectomy: Treatment displacement vs intraoperative drift [J].
Azar, DT ;
Yeh, PC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 124 (03) :312-320
[3]   Maximum permissible lateral decentration in aberration-sensing and wavefront-guided corneal ablation [J].
Bueeler, M ;
Mrochen, M ;
Seiler, T .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 29 (02) :257-263
[4]   TOPOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CENTRATION OF EXCIMER LASER PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY [J].
CAVANAUGH, TB ;
DURRIE, DS ;
RIEDEL, SM ;
HUNKELER, JD ;
LESHER, MP .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 19 :136-143
[5]   Effect of rotation and translation on the expected benefit of an ideal method to correct the eye's higher-order aberrations [J].
Guirao, A ;
Williams, DR ;
Cox, IG .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2001, 18 (05) :1003-1015
[6]   Corneal optical irregularity after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy [J].
Hersh, PS ;
Shah, SI ;
Geiger, D ;
Holladay, JT ;
Cavanaugh, T ;
Hunkeler, J ;
Michelson, M ;
Owen, J ;
Gordon, M ;
Puliafito, C ;
Raizman, M ;
Pepose, J .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 22 (02) :197-204
[7]   Mathematical model of corneal surface smoothing after laser refractive surgery [J].
Huang, D ;
Tang, ML ;
Shekhar, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 135 (03) :267-278
[8]   Spot size and quality of scanning laser correction of higher-order wavefront aberrations [J].
Huang, D ;
Arif, M .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (03) :407-416
[9]  
Huppertz M, 2001, CUSTOMIZED CORNEAL ABLATION, P149
[10]   THE PHYSICS OF UV LASER CORNEA ABLATION [J].
KITAI, MS ;
POPKOV, VL ;
SEMCHISHEN, VA ;
KHARIZOV, AA .
IEEE JOURNAL OF QUANTUM ELECTRONICS, 1991, 27 (02) :302-307