A matched-pair comparison of inlay and onlay trochlear designs for patellofemoral arthroplasty: no differences in clinical outcome but less progression of osteoarthritis with inlay designs

被引:48
作者
Feucht, Matthias J. [1 ,2 ]
Cotic, Matthias [1 ]
Beitzel, Knut [1 ]
Baldini, Julia F. [1 ]
Meidinger, Gebhart [1 ,3 ]
Schoettle, Philip B. [1 ,4 ]
Imhoff, Andreas B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Orthopaed Sports Med, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Freiburg Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg & Traumatol, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Trauma Ctr Murnau, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed Surg, Murnau, Germany
[4] Isar Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Munich, Germany
关键词
Patellofemoral arthritis; Patellofemoral arthroplasty; Inlay; Onlay; HemiCAP Wave; Journey PFJ; SAGITTAL PLANE KINEMATICS; JOINT REPLACEMENT; FOLLOW-UP; ARTHRITIS; KNEE; 5-YEAR; CONTRAINDICATIONS; PROSTHESIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-015-3733-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
To compare clinical and radiographic results after isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) using either a second-generation inlay or onlay trochlear design. The hypothesis was that an inlay design will produce better clinical results and less progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) compared to an onlay design. Fifteen consecutive patients undergoing isolated PFA with an onlay design trochlear component (Journey (TM) PFJ, Smith & Nephew) were matched with 15 patients after isolated PFA with an inlay design trochlear component (HemiCAP(A (R)) Wave, Arthrosurface). Matching criteria were age, gender, body mass index, and follow-up period. An independent observer evaluated patients prospectively, whereas data were compared retrospectively. Clinical outcome was assessed using WOMAC, Lysholm score, and pain VAS. Kellgren-Lawrence grading was used to assess progression of tibiofemoral OA. Conversion to total knee arthroplasty was necessary in one patient within each group, leaving 14 patients per group for final evaluation. The mean follow-up was 26 months in the inlay group and 25 months in the onlay group (n.s.). Both groups displayed significant improvements of all clinical scores (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to the clinical outcome and reoperation rate. No significant progression of tibiofemoral OA was observed in the inlay group, whereas 53 % of the onlay group showed progression of medial and/or lateral tibiofemoral OA (p = 0.009). Isolated PFA using either a second-generation inlay or onlay trochlear component significantly improves functional outcome scores and pain. The theoretical advantages of an inlay design did not result in better clinical outcome scores; however, progression of tibiofemoral OA was significantly less common in patients with an inlay trochlear component. This implant design may therefore improve long-term results and survival rates after isolated PFA. III.
引用
收藏
页码:2784 / 2791
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty - Five-year survivorship and functional results [J].
Ackroyd, C. E. ;
Newman, J. H. ;
Evans, R. ;
Eldridge, J. D. J. ;
Joslin, C. C. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2007, 89B (03) :310-315
[3]  
ARCIERO RA, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P60
[4]   Prospective clinical and radiological two-year results after patellofemoral arthroplasty using an implant with an asymmetric trochlea design [J].
Beitzel, Knut ;
Schoettle, Philip B. ;
Cotic, Matthias ;
Dharmesh, Vyas ;
Imhoff, Andreas B. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2013, 21 (02) :332-339
[5]  
BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
[6]  
BLAZINA ME, 1979, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P98
[7]   The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty: a series of 17 cases [J].
Board, TN ;
Mahmood, A ;
Ryan, WG ;
Banks, AJ .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2004, 124 (05) :285-287
[8]   Patellofemoral joint replacement, an evolving concept [J].
Borus, Todd ;
Brilhault, Jean ;
Confalonieri, Norberto ;
Johnson, Derek ;
Thienpont, Emmanuel .
KNEE, 2014, 21 :S47-S50
[9]  
Brattstrom H, 1964, ACTA ORTHOP SCAN S68, V68, P61
[10]  
Cannon Anthony, 2008, Iowa Orthop J, V28, P42