Effects of cementless fixation of implant prosthesis: A finite element study

被引:19
作者
Lee, Hyeonjong [1 ]
Park, Soyeon [2 ]
Kwon, Kung-Rock [3 ]
Noh, Gunwoo [2 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Yangsan, South Korea
[2] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Daegu, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Finite element analysis; Implant prosthesis; Cementless fixation; STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL IMPLANT; BONE LOSS; SCREW; TOOTH; RESTORATIONS; EXCESS;
D O I
10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.341
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. A novel retentive type of implant prosthesis that does not require the use of cement or screw holes has been introduced; however, there are few reports examining the biomechanical aspects of this novel implant. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical features of cementless fixation (CLF) implant prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The test groups of three variations of CLF implant prostheses and a control group of conventional cement-retained (CR) prosthesis were designed three-dimensionally for finite element analysis. The test groups were divided according to the abutment shape and the relining strategy on the inner surface of the implant crown as follows; resin-air hole-full (RAF), resin-air hole (RA), and resin-no air hole (RNA). The von Mises stress and principal stress were used to evaluate the stress values and distributions of the implant components. Contact open values were calculated to analyze the gap formation of the contact surfaces at the abutment-resin and abutment-implant interfaces. The micro-strain values were evaluated for the surrounding bone. RESULTS. Values reflecting the maximum stress on the abutment were as follows (in MPa): RAF, 25.6; RA, 23.4; RNA, 20.0; and CR, 15.8. The value of gap formation was measured from 0.88 to 1.19 mu m at the abutmentresin interface and 24.4 to 24.7 mu m at the abutment-implant interface. The strain distribution was similar in all cases. CONCLUSION. CLF had no disadvantages in terms of the biomechanical features compared with conventional CR implant prosthesis and could be successfully applied for implant prosthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 349
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Comparison of Cemented vs Screw-Retained, Customized Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Zirconia Abutments for Esthetically Located Single-Tooth Implants: A 10-Year Randomized Prospective Study [J].
Amorfini, Leonardo ;
Storelli, Stefano ;
Mosca, Daniela ;
Scanferla, Massimo ;
Romeo, Eugenio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2018, 31 (04) :359-366
[2]   Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Araujo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido ;
de Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo ;
de Faria Almeida, Daniel Augusto ;
Santiago Junior, Joel Ferreira ;
Verri, Fellippo Ramos ;
Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 115 (04) :419-427
[3]   Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis [J].
Bulaqi, Haddad Arabi ;
Mashhadi, Mahmoud Mousavi ;
Safari, Hamed ;
Samandari, Mohammad Mahdi ;
Geramipanah, Farideh .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 113 (06) :548-557
[4]  
Cicciu M, 2014, INT J CLIN EXP MED, V7, P817
[5]   Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study [J].
Gehrke, Peter ;
Bleuel, Konstantin ;
Fischer, Carsten ;
Sader, Robert .
BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
[6]   Probabilistic analysis of preload in the abutment screw of a dental implant complex [J].
Guda, Teja ;
Ross, Thomas A. ;
Lang, Lisa A. ;
Millwater, Harry R. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2008, 100 (03) :183-193
[7]   Contact analysis of gap formation at dental implant-abutment interface under oblique loading: A numerical-experimental study [J].
He, Yiting ;
Fok, Alex ;
Aparicio, Conrado ;
Teng, Wei .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (04) :741-752
[8]   Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry [J].
Hebel, KS ;
Gajjar, RC .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1997, 77 (01) :28-35
[9]   Finite element analysis to determine implant preload [J].
Lang, LA ;
Kang, B ;
Wang, RF ;
Lang, BR .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 90 (06) :539-546
[10]   Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of short dental implants in a resorbed mandible [J].
Lee, Hyeonjong ;
Park, Soyeon ;
Noh, Gunwoo .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 121 (04) :659-670