Analyzing spillover effects between carbon and fossil energy markets from a time-varying perspective

被引:141
作者
Gong, Xu [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Rong [1 ]
Xu, Jun [1 ]
Lin, Boqiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, China Inst Studies Energy Policy, Sch Management, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Innovat Lab Sci & Technol Energy Mat Fujian Prov, Xiamen 361101, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Time-varying spillover effects; Time lag; Periodicity; TVP-VAR-SV model; Impulse response function; EUROPEAN CARBON; VOLATILITY SPILLOVERS; NATURAL-GAS; CO2; PRICES; OIL; IMPACT; ELECTRICITY; DEPENDENCE; ALLOWANCE; LINKAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116384
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The carbon market is closely related to fossil energy markets, but few studies focus on the intensity and direction of the time-varying spillover effects, the time delaying and periodicity between the two classes of markets. This paper uses the time-varying vector parameter autoregressive model with stochastic volatility (TVP-VAR-SV model) and impulse response function to study these issues based on the weekly data of European carbon futures prices and three fossil energy (oil, coal, and natural gas) futures prices. The empirical results indicate that: Firstly, there are obvious spillover effects between the carbon market and fossil energy markets, in which the strength and direction are time-varying and asymmetrical. Secondly, as a whole, the coal market has the greatest impact on the carbon market. Finally, the duration of the time-varying spillover effects between the carbon market and fossil energy markets is around three weeks, and the spillover effect diminishes over time. Especially, the time-varying spillover effect is most significant in the case of one-week lag. The above results can provide practical advice for investors, relevant companies and policymakers. Moreover, it can improve the carbon market mechanism to achieve the purpose of emission reduction.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Volatility spillover of energy stocks in different periods and clusters based on structural break recognition and network method [J].
An, Pengli ;
Li, Huajiao ;
Zhou, Jinsheng ;
Li, Yang ;
Sun, Bowen ;
Guo, Sui ;
Qi, Yajie .
ENERGY, 2020, 191
[2]   Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models [J].
Bai, J ;
Perron, P .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2003, 18 (01) :1-22
[3]   Risk spillovers across the energy and carbon markets and hedging strategies for carbon risk [J].
Balcilar, Mehmet ;
Demirer, Riza ;
Hammoudeh, Shawkat ;
Duc Khuong Nguyen .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 54 :159-172
[4]   Forecasting carbon futures volatility using GARCH models with energy volatilities [J].
Byun, Suk Joon ;
Cho, Hangjun .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 40 :207-221
[5]   How competitive are EU electricity markets? An assessment of ETS Phase II [J].
Castagneto-Gissey, Giorgio .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 73 :278-297
[8]   Interaction between Australian carbon prices and energy prices [J].
Cotton, D. ;
Trueck, S. .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 18 (04) :208-222
[9]   Carbon price drivers: Phase I versus Phase II equilibrium? [J].
Creti, Anna ;
Jouvet, Pierre-Andre ;
Mignon, Valerie .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (01) :327-334
[10]   Is the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) informationally efficient? Evidence from momentum-based trading strategies [J].
Crossland, Jarrod ;
Li, Bin ;
Roca, Eduardo .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 109 :10-23