A smoothing method for solving portfolio optimization with CVaR and applications in allocation of generation asset

被引:39
作者
Tong, Xiaojiao [1 ]
Qi, Liqun [2 ]
Wu, Felix [3 ]
Zhou, Hui [4 ]
机构
[1] Changsha Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Math, Changsha 410076, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Appl Math, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Portfolio optimization; Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR); Smoothing method; Allocation of generation asset; VALUE-AT-RISK; CONDITIONAL VALUE; COHERENT MEASURES; CONVERGENCE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.amc.2009.12.031
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on the computation issue of portfolio optimization with scenario-based CVaR. According to the semismoothness of the studied models, a smoothing technology is considered, and a smoothing SQP algorithm then is presented. The global convergence of the algorithm is established. Numerical examples arising from the allocation of generation assets in power markets are done. The computation efficiency between the proposed method and the linear programming (LP) method is compared. Numerical results show that the performance of the new approach is very good. The remarkable characteristic of the new method is threefold. First, the dimension of smoothing models for portfolio optimization with scenario-based CVaR is low and is independent of the number of samples. Second, the smoothing models retain the convexity of original portfolio optimization problems. Third, the complicated smoothing model that maximizes the profit under the CVaR constraint can be reduced to an ordinary optimization model equivalently. All of these show the advantage of the new method to improve the computation efficiency for solving portfolio optimization problems with CVaR measure. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1723 / 1740
页数:18
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Coherent risk measures in inventory problems [J].
Ahmed, Shabbir ;
Cakmak, Ulas ;
Shapiro, Alexander .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 182 (01) :226-238
[2]   Credit risk optimization with Conditional Value-at-Risk criterion [J].
Andersson, F ;
Mausser, H ;
Rosen, D ;
Uryasev, S .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2001, 89 (02) :273-291
[3]   Coherent measures of risk [J].
Artzner, P ;
Delbaen, F ;
Eber, JM ;
Heath, D .
MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 1999, 9 (03) :203-228
[4]   Non-smooth optimization methods for computation of the Conditional Value-at-risk and portfolio optimization [J].
Beliakov, Gleb ;
Bagirov, Adil .
OPTIMIZATION, 2006, 55 (5-6) :459-479
[5]  
Clarke F.H, 1983, OPTIMIZATION NONSMOO
[6]  
Dahlgren R., 2002, IEEE T POWER SYST, V18, P503
[7]  
Delage E., 2008, DISTRIBUTIONALLY ROB
[8]   Portfolio optimization with stochastic dominance constraints [J].
Dentcheva, D ;
Ruszczynski, A .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2006, 30 (02) :433-451
[9]   Handling CVaR objectives and constraints in two-stage stochastic models [J].
Fabian, Csaba I. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 191 (03) :888-911
[10]  
Feng Dong-han, 2005, Automation of Electric Power Systems, V29, P14