Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions

被引:312
作者
Lingsma, Hester F. [2 ]
Roozenbeek, Bob [1 ,2 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout W. [2 ]
Murray, Gordon D. [3 ]
Maas, Andrew I. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth, Ctr Med Decis Making, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Div Community Hlth Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
SEVERE HEAD-INJURY; SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; CEREBRAL PERFUSION-PRESSURE; INTENSIVE INSULIN THERAPY; NEURON-SPECIFIC-ENOLASE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION; OUTCOME PREDICTION; SECONDARY INSULTS;
D O I
10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70065-X
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a heterogeneous condition that encompasses a broad spectrum of disorders. Outcome can be highly variable, particularly in more severely injured patients. Despite the association of many variables with outcome, prognostic predictions are notoriously difficult to make. Multivariable analysis has identified age, clinical severity, CT abnormalities, systemic insults (hypoxia and hypotension), and laboratory variables as relevant factors to include in models to predict outcome in individual patients. Advances in statistical modelling and the availability of large datasets have facilitated the development of prognostic models that have greater performance and generalisability. Two prediction models are currently available, both of which have been developed on large datasets with state-of-the-art methods, and offer new opportunities. We see great potential for their use in clinical practice, research, and policy making, as well as for assessment of the quality of health-care delivery. Continued development, refinement, and validation is advocated, together with assessment of the clinical impact of prediction models, including treatment response.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 554
页数:12
相关论文
共 128 条
  • [1] Apolipoprotein E4 allele presence and functional outcome after severe traumatic brain injury
    Alexander, Sheila
    Kerr, Mary E.
    Kim, Yookyung
    Kamboh, M. Ilyas
    Beers, Sue R.
    Conley, Yvette P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2007, 24 (05) : 790 - 797
  • [2] Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data: a comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regression
    Andrews, PJD
    Sleeman, DH
    Statham, PFX
    McQuatt, A
    Corruble, V
    Jones, PA
    Howells, TP
    Macmillan, CSA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 97 (02) : 326 - 336
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, BMJ, V336, P425, DOI DOI 10.1136/bmj.39461.643438.25
  • [4] [Anonymous], ABBR INJ SCAL 1990 R
  • [5] Traumatic brain injury and functional outcomes: Does minority status matter?
    Arango-Lasprilla, Juan Carlos
    Rosenthal, Mitchell
    Deluca, John
    Komaroff, Eugene
    Sherer, Mark
    Cifu, David
    Hanks, Robin
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2007, 21 (07) : 701 - 708
  • [6] Prognosis of traumatic head injury in South Tunisia: A multivariate analysis of 437 cases
    Bahloul, M
    Chelly, H
    Ben Hmida, M
    Ben Hamida, C
    Ksibi, H
    Kallel, H
    Chaari, A
    Kassis, M
    Rekik, N
    Bouaziz, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 57 (02): : 255 - 261
  • [7] INJURY SEVERITY SCORE - METHOD FOR DESCRIBING PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE INJURIES AND EVALUATING EMERGENCY CARE
    BAKER, SP
    ONEILL, B
    HADDON, W
    LONG, WB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1974, 14 (03): : 187 - 196
  • [8] Balestreri M, 2004, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V75, P161
  • [9] SERIAL MULTIMODALITY-EVOKED POTENTIALS IN SEVERELY HEAD-INJURED PATIENTS - DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS
    BARELLI, A
    VALENTE, MR
    CLEMENTE, A
    BOZZA, P
    PROIETTI, R
    DELLACORTE, F
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1991, 19 (11) : 1374 - 1381
  • [10] Beaudeux J-L, 2009, Ann Pharm Fr, V67, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.pharma.2009.03.002