Point-of-care testing for patients with diabetes, hyperlipidaemia or coagulation disorders in the general practice setting: a systematic review

被引:40
作者
Gialamas, Angela [1 ]
St John, Andrew [2 ]
Laurence, Caroline Olivia [1 ]
Bubner, Tanya Kaye [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Gen Practice, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] ARC Consulting, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Anticoagulant therapy; diabetes; general practice; hyperlipidaemia; point-of-care testing; ORAL ANTICOAGULATION MANAGEMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; SATISFACTION; MELLITUS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/cmp084
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Point-of-care testing (PoCT) is increasingly being used in the general practice setting and has the potential to provide improved health outcomes for patients. Objectives. The aim of the study was to systematically assess the literature relating to the analytical performance, clinical effectiveness, cost and satisfaction of patients and health professionals with PoCT for monitoring patients with diabetes, with hyperlipidaemia or requiring anticoagulant therapy in general practice. Methods. Systematic review and synthesis of randomized and quasi-randomized trials during 1966-2007 was performed. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Current Contents, BIDS and the Cochrane Library databases were searched using key terms relating to PoCT for diabetes (glycosylated haemoglobin, urine albumin creatinine ratio), hyperlipidaemia (total cholesterol, triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein) and anticoagulant therapy (international normalized ratio) in the general practice setting. Results. Nine papers from six randomized or quasi-randomized trials were included in the review. Large between-study heterogeneity made pooling of the data inappropriate. In terms of clinical effectiveness, no study found a significant difference between PoCT and pathology laboratory testing. There was a similar lack of data in relation to the analytical performance of PoCT, to cost outcomes and to patient and health professional satisfaction, making conclusions difficult to infer. Conclusions. This systematic review does not provide robust evidence that PoCT in general practice improves patient health outcomes, that it has comparable analytical quality to pathology laboratory testing, that it is cost-effective compared to usual care or that patients and health professionals find PoCT satisfactory. The number of trials is low, the follow-up of patients is short and many of the trials did not investigate PoCT as a separate intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 24
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, HLTH TECHNOL ASSESS
  • [2] The belgian improvement study on oral anticoagulation therapy: a randomized clinical trial
    Claes, N
    Buntinx, F
    Vijgen, J
    Arnout, J
    Vermylen, J
    Fieuws, S
    Van Loon, H
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (20) : 2159 - 2165
  • [3] Estimating the cost-effectiveness of quality-improving interventions in oral anticoagulation management within general practice
    Claes, Neree
    Moeremans, Karen
    Buntinx, Frank
    Arnout, Jef
    Vermylen, Jos
    Van Loon, Herman
    Annemans, Lieven
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (06) : 369 - 376
  • [4] *ESP HEALTHC INT, 2007, ESPI1635947 ESP HEAL
  • [5] Oral anticoagulation management in primary care with the use of computerized decision support and near-patient testing -: A randomized, controlled trial
    Fitzmaurice, DA
    Hobbs, FDR
    Murray, ET
    Holder, RL
    Allan, TF
    Rose, PE
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (15) : 2343 - 2348
  • [6] Khunti K, 2006, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V56, P511
  • [7] A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting - rationale, design and baseline characteristics
    Laurence, Caroline
    Gialamas, Angela
    Yelland, Lisa
    Bubner, Tanya
    Ryan, Philip
    Willson, Kristyn
    Glastonbury, Briony
    Gill, Janice
    Shephard, Mark
    Beilby, Justin
    [J]. TRIALS, 2008, 9 (1)
  • [8] Rapid A1c availability improves clinical decision-making in an urban primary care clinic
    Miller, CD
    Barnes, CS
    Phillips, LS
    Ziemer, DC
    Gallina, D
    Cook, CB
    Maryman, SD
    El-Kebbi, IM
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (04) : 1158 - 1163
  • [9] Anticoagulation management in primary care: a trial-based economic evaluation
    Parry, D
    Fitzmaurice, D
    Raftery, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2000, 111 (02) : 530 - 533
  • [10] Price C.P., 2004, Point-of-Care Testing: What, Why, When, and Where?